Jump to content

Talk:Aruba at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 08:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • What country is Aruba? I dare say that a lot of readers would have no clue what it is.
  • "Beijing, People's Republic of China."
  • "Comité Olimpico Arubano" italicise, since it's a foreign term.
  • "did not medal." any missing word?
  • "Olympic games by 2008, where when its entrance" by the way, games should be capitalised.
  • "aboard the KLM Flight 765" the implies that Flight 765 has received significant coverage, which I don't think it has, or was mentioned earlier in the article.
  • "Judo at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Qualification" should replace hyphen with dash.
  • "for FINA by doing well" please spell FINA's full name because it's the first time the organisation is mentioned.
  • "List of Flagbearers Bejing [sic] 2008" why's there a "[sic]" tag?

Fixed sans the first issue, since not sure what I can do besides have the link in the first word. As for the sic tag, Beijing is spelled wrong (Bejing). Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
End note

Very happy with the article – no major problems, and it complies with GA standards. Hope this will get FA status. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 00:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]