Talk:Artuir mac Áedán

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 23 February 2019 by reviewer Robert McClenon (talk · contribs).

Reviewer Note

This draft appears to satisfy notability.

This is about the past and is reasonably well-documented. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:00, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The last sentence of the section headed "Artuir mac Aedan as King Arthur" is baseless. Even if Ben Athuir is named for the prince, there is nothing to suggest that Arthur type or related names in Strathclyde have anything to do with the prince. It's already been reasonably argued that the prince's name likely owes to a mother from a British kingdom like Alt Clut. So having such names in Strathclyde would owe to that common Brythonic link and not some prince who died fighting Picts.

Arthur?

The Historicity of King Arthur page lists Artuir Mac Aedan as a proposed identity of "the" historical Arthur. Should that be mentioned on this page? Vultur~enwiki (talk) 02:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bts

bts is so underrated and they get a lot of hate mostly there fans get more hate for liking them and liking kpop. As an Army myself I think that we should all go against bts haters and stand together. I purple you 💜 goodbye 2A00:23C7:652D:CB01:1C71:D792:4C13:57AC (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]