Talk:Artist's Studio—Look Mickey/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Lead is a bit short.
- Expanded.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Details --> Description
- "For someone familiar with the artist's oeuvre, the Studios could become mental playgrounds." --> Who said that?
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Critical commentary --> This really isn't enough for its own section.
- I have added some more. I know the section is still small, but I think it is proper to format a work with this type of section if we can source a few comments, like we have.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it is fine now. Statυs (talk) 06:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Everything else looks good. Well referenced and written.
- All issues have been addressed. Passing the article! Great work! Statυs (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- drive by comment
- I think given the excessive quotes in the footnotes copyvio should be addressed. MathewTownsend (talk) 17:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)