Talk:Artificial intelligence for video surveillance

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Artificial intelligence for video surveillance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computer science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Mass surveillance Mid‑importance

	Artificial intelligence for video surveillance is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer Vision Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Vision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer Vision on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer VisionWikipedia:WikiProject Computer VisionTemplate:WikiProject Computer VisionComputer Vision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Page name and other issues

Our Wikipedia page name (title) has been changed to: Artificial intelligence for video surveillance; Although this title may not be literally incorrect or inappropriate, it does not sufficiently cover the scope of the entire process discussed (which occurs subsequent to and as a separate, adjunctive function to surveillance - and in terms of practical security relevance and significance, exceeds by far the limitations of mere surveillance). To wit - we are discussing a software technology and not specifically video surveillance.
the rewriting of the article to less-technical more-accessible standards has not yet been acknowledged
the links pointing to this article from other related Wikipedia articles has not helped to get our page out of orphan status (and/or are being ignored for some reason?)
Please explain #'s 2 and 3 (since the warnings on the page have not been taken down but rather we are now faced with an additional complication of having our page redirected)
The article is better titled Video Analytics for Video Surveillance; What is described is older technology. AI for video surveillance requires a different engine where inputs by the user to identify images as to its content or to correct video analytic generated events as true or false can cause the AI engine to learn from its mistakes. RobFire2233 (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How do we appeal to return this article to its original title: Artificial Intelligence for Security

or 'Artificial intelligence for security'

(went to the talk page of the editor to post this message - Could not find box to type message in)

Ferrara p (talk) 17:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that "artificial intelligence for security" can in theory deal with a variety of non-video sensors. These sensors include audio (exclusively), radar, laser, network security firewalls and intrusion detection systems, toxic gas sensors, and just about all other sensors with any bearing on security. This should have been obvious. The article, as I see it, however talks merely about processing video feeds. As such, the title of "artificial intelligence for security" would be excessive and therefore inappropriate. Secondly, the prior title "Artificial Intelligence for Security" does not meet the case conventions for page titles on Wikipedia. If you would like to propose a new title, please do so here, but the original title is not specific enough.

I have removed the orphan status.

--IO Device (talk) 19:39, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Section headings

Is there anyway to simplify some of the longer section headings? Those headings seem like they might be difficult to link to, and don't quite follow Wikipedia conventions. Me, Myself & I (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

article is not too technical

The article gone-through and re-written from its original in order to make it readable by a non-technical reader. There is no appearance of prolix or jargon or any attempt to make things sound more complicated. In a topic such as this there is a whole universe of possible technical terms, acronyms and technicality. None of that is present. This is a rendering of the subject in the most accessible way, respecting the reader's intelligence, while making no presumptions of any specialized knowledge on their part. There is no requisite of advanced knowledge in order to understand the article.

Although the standards of an encyclopedia allow a somewhat higher level of reading ability than those of daily newspapers, this article could be understood by a typical newspaper readership. When compared to many articles in Wikipedia that are much more technical and yet not marked with a warning of technicality, it is apparent that to maintain a uniform standard throughout as much as possible, this warning should be removed. The purpose of the article is to inform. To make it any less technical would reduce it to jingoism such as "Artificial intelligence for video surveillance (or security) is like computers or robots watching cameras that watch people to see if something bad is happening." That would surely meet the "non technical" warning's goals but at the same time would render the article as not useful. I would consider removing that is light of this clarification. Ken Hantman (talk) 00:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]