Talk:Artificial Intelligence Markup Language

Charlix was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on February 19, 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Artificial Intelligence Markup Language. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Merger with ALICE article

The alice article seems to be a stub. It should redirect here. Much of the topics and history listed here would in fact apply to the other article— Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.232.27.17 (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on AIML. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060325195507/http://www.chatterboxchallenge.com/ to http://www.chatterboxchallenge.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AIML. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is mistake in code and its explanation

<category>
  <pattern>WHAT IS YOUR NAME</pattern>
  <template>My name is Michael N.S Evanious.</template>
</category>
When this category is loaded, an AIML bot will respond to the input "What is your name" with the response "My name is John."

in the above example the template <template>My name is Michael N.S Evanious.</template> and in its explanation it says that it will show a response "My name is John", but it should be "Michael N.S Evanious"

Either change the example code from <template>My name is Michael N.S Evanious.</template> to <template>My name is John</template> or correct the Explanation according to the code. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ECAELDHOSE (talk • contribs) 11:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was just a syntax error. Most everyone caught that right away. Out of courtesy ... please keep redlines brief folks. 98.194.39.86 (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

XML - "language" flavor of the day. Not relevant.

This may or may not be a valid topic, but the emphasis on XML is just silly. This could have been done in any language or construct. The fact that it used XML, which is now virtually obsolete (for good reasons) - is irrelevant to the topic of AI. I would vote that this article be deleted. The incorporation of XML into the study of AI adds zero value. It was simply a "wrapper" - and a bad one at that. Bad? Yes, it was bad because as well all know, it's simply too "fat" and unnecessarily verbose. The use of duplicate labels as delimiters (sentinels) was silly from Day One, and it will never make sense. Very closely related to COBOL in rationale. Human readable, yes. Effective? No. 98.194.39.86 (talk) 00:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]