Talk:Articulata (superphylum)
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 8 October 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed move request (closed by non-admin page mover) Mdewman6 (talk) 07:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Articulata hypothesis → Articulata (superphylum) – The title "Articulata hypothesis" is misleading, as its true subject isn't the hypothesis, but the taxon. What's more, any taxon named "Articulata" is part of a hypothesis. Now it's true that there is no ancestor taxon that we can use to disambiguate here, as the parent is Protostomia, which is an ancestor of Articulata (Brachiopoda) and Articulata (Cyclostomata) too. Hence we use the rank. The other 3 Articulatas are all below phylum. Grey Clownfish (talk) 07:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.