Talk:Artaxata

	Artaxata is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Artashat, Armenia was copied or moved into Artashat (ancient city) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Requested move 12 January 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved Artashat (ancient city) to Artaxata. Did not perform the move of Artashat, Armenia to Artashat since the proposed target is occupied by a DAB page. File a new move request and explain what to do with the DAB page if you disagree. EdJohnston (talk) 19:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{requested move/dated}}

Artashat (ancient city) → Artaxata – WP:COMMONAME Երևանցի ^talk 18:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Artashat, Armenia → Artashat

Similar to Tigranocerta (Tigranakert). In English, the Greek version of the names of ancient Armenian cities is more common. Britannica and Iranica both go with Artaxata.

Google Books search for "Artaxata"/"Artashat" ancient

"Artaxata" ancient - 4,620 results
"Artashat" ancient - 963 results

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Is it? is it really commonname? In ictu oculi (talk) 10:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per the OP. Classical Greek/Latin names are indeed more common (and recognizable) in Western literature, especially in the context of ancient history. Cf. also usage in GScholar: Artaxata, 1710 hits vs Artashat, 358 hits, with many of the latter not dealing with the ancient city at all. Since the article in question limits itself to the specific period, it makes sense. Constantine ✍ 10:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. It appears to me that Artaxata is the more common name. There should be hatnotes between the two. — Amakuru (talk) 09:56, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

No time (period, century) indicated in the legends

The period, or at least the century, is missing from all plans, illustrations, and the reconstruction! Treated like a legend, "way back, in the good ole' days". One single photo has this type of info, it allegedly shows Urartian remains, but based on what? Archaeology and history start and end on the time axis, w/o it's just a nice illustrated fairy tale. Arminden (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]