Talk:Art Production Fund

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Art Production Fund article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Sentence sans ref

For "...APF was developed out of the recognition that many ambitious art projects require innovative production strategies because they have few precedents and demand new approaches – they involve the collaboration of several disciplines, exceed the size or scale of traditional art installations, and engage the general public in a unique way.", where is the reference that supports all this? David notMD (talk) 22:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: I think it is safe to delete that. It was in the first published version from 2009, but was sourced to a now defunct blog.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CoI tag

Hi, thank you to everyone who worked on this article yesterday (I only had time to add the cleanup tag). It seems reasonable to remove that now since the content seems to have been fairly thoroughly vetted; would you agree, or should I leave it for the time being? YorkshireLad ✿ ^(talk) 10:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you added the tag and you think the reasons why you added it were addressed, then you or anyone else (except someone with a COI) can remove the template per WP:MTR. Maintenance templates like this aren’t meant to "punish" or "reprimand" either the subject of the article or the COI editor involved; they are just meant to let others know that a problem seems to exist. Once the problem has been sufficiently addressed, the template can and probably should be removed. If someone disagrees, they can always re-add it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; as you've probably seen, I've removed it, since the concerns I had with the wording have indeed been addressed. YorkshireLad ✿ ^(talk) 10:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]