Talk:Arrested Development/GA2
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Saw1998 (talk · contribs) 07:54, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! Great article. I have no problem saying its a definite pass, really, but three minor things itched at me:
- You should offer a list of the characters alongside the descriptions of them. I think people should be able to grab the names and cast members a little more at a glance.
- Under recurring characters, where's Julia Louis-Dreyfus as the "blind" compulsive liar?
- You should offer a list of the characters alongside the descriptions of them. I think people should be able to grab the names and cast members a little more at a glance.
- Under the season plot summaries, I think you should include more about the banana shack & it burning down.
- Under the season plot summaries, I think you should include more about the banana shack & it burning down.
- However, I also thought that the descriptions of the characters were very in-depth, and quite a bit more advanced an some I have seen in the past.
- Also, the information about the cast was very great, and I liked the part about Will Arnett.
- There was absolutely no noticeable bias in the article.
- There was a lot of detail about the upcoming season-- good!
- The pictures you offered were really good, especially the title card you chose.
- Lastly, the theme for the info box was appropriate-- the red was very well matched, which gives the article a more organized look.
- Oh, and references-- you had 92, which is a perfect number, and no IMDb I need to sleep you for.
Overall, it was really well-written, and it didn't bore me to death to read. GOOD ARTICLE! ---Saw1998 (talk) 07:54, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, Saw1998. Firstly, thanks so much for the review and pass. I've added Julia Louis-Dreyfus to the Recurring characters section, per your suggestion. Regarding your suggestion about a list of characters, this article has been obeying WP:PROSE. While it may be more visually appealing to include a list, in Wikipedia it is generally more acceptable for prose. And the Banana stand should be added in the future. Thanks again! -- Wikipedical (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2012 (UTC)