Talk:Arrernte people

Australia: Northern Territory / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Arrernte people is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Spelling

Shouldn't it be spelled Arrernte? Dougg 07:00, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

'Nations'??

I don't know what it means to talk about an Aboriginal 'nation'. I've never heard Arrernte people talk about themselves as a nation. Also, I don't believe the implied claim that Pitjantjatjara has a population of more than 25,000.

Arrernte land south of Alice Springs

(note: There are no Arrernte lands South of Alice Springs, as these lands belong to Pitjantjatjara, which is primarily in South Australia)

I deleted the above from the article as it's incorrect. Dougg 03:46, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Language

The languages of Aboriginal people in close proximity to each other traditionally have significant overlap.

Any languages, anywhere, that are in close proximity can come to have significant overlap. I might delete it.

Overlap also exists with Luritja, Warlpiri and Pitjantjatjara being 80% identical to Arrernte.

Is this referring to lexicon or grammar or both? Either way, I'm not sure that it's true, or relevant. The main point surely is that: Luritja and Pitjantjatjara are mutually intelligible and are therefore dialects of a single language. Luritja/Pitjantjatjara, Warlpiri and Arrernte however are not mutually intelligible and so are different languages. Dougg 10:17, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I've deleted the above lines about '...traditionally have significant overlap' and the one about the three languages being '...80% identical'. Dougg 23:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Split proposal

Seems reasonable. Dougg 00:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

I'd like to improve (or replace) the pronunciation in the lead-in with a version in IPA, preferably for both Arrernte and (Australian) English. From what I've gathered in the article on the Arrernte language, I think the correct pronunciation is /arəɳɖə/. Does anyone know if that is correct? And do Aussies pronounce it somewhere close to /əˈɹʌndə/? That's how this American would say it, at least... — ˈzɪzɨvə (talk) 03:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I gather the indig. pron. is {[aˈrVɳɖV], where V is not-[a]. The English names are Aranda and Arunta, and the latter at least is presumably /əˈrʌndə/. kwami (talk) 23:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename page to "Arrernte people"

They seem to be known in most places as "Arrernte", even in their native language. The article on their lands is called "Arrernte lands", the article on their language is called "Arrernte language". I propose "Aranda people" be renamed to become uniform with the rest.

This makes sense to me. I'll be bold and make the change in a day or so. Boneymau (talk) 02:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noticing the variant spelling throughout the article, I have standardised all references to the word as Arrernte, except where Aranda is specifically used for a reason. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:36, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aranda people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]