Talk:Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.

Comprised and comprising

JHunter didn't like the Supreme Court's style, so he changed the opinion (a blockquote) to reflect his ideas of better usage. That should be a NO NO. If you don't like what they say, at most you use a "[sic]." You don't edit the opinion. In this case, the reason for the edit was not even valid. This is not a claim. It is a prose statement. "Comprised of" is perfectly OK and even sounds better. PraeceptorIP (talk) 18:49, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]