Talk:Arne Slettebak

Arne Slettebak has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 15, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 18 December 2023 by reviewer Cerebellum (talk · contribs).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

‹See TfM›

Physics: Biographies Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Arne Slettebak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sgubaldo (talk · contribs) 20:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Ldm1954 (talk · contribs) 22:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this shortly. However, one thing strikes me immediately -- notability! As currently structured this is unclear. Did he get any major awards? Where is there a good source of his publications and citations? What papers by others demonstrate his impact, beyond the orbituary? I will be happier if you handle those first as I am not comfortable about doing a GAR when notability is not 200% obvious. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No major awards that I'm aware of. I couldn't find a source that listed all his publications and citations in on place. I sent this article through AfC a while ago, but my thought process at the time on his notability was that he scraped through by being director of two observatories, a member of the International Astronomical Union and a councilor (and I believe therefore also a memebr) of the American Astronomical Society. I suppose I'm not opposed to AfD if you think it's needed. Sgubaldo (talk) 23:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He may scrape by, and normally we don't require proof. However, I think for GA we need more. Can you do an ISI search or simiar? Maybe a boring hand count of his pubs via GS? Ldm1954 (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll have a look sometime this week. Sgubaldo (talk) 13:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using Google Scholar, I counted 89 items between books, papers and other publications. 2 pubs with 500+ citations, 3 with 300+, 7 with 100+, several more between 50-100. Sgubaldo (talk) 19:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please count his h-factor. Make a list of how many cites for each then sort (e. g. Excel) Ldm1954 (talk) 20:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully I've done this correctly. Counting from the link above, h-index seems to be 38. Sgubaldo (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will accept this as passing WP:NPROF #C1 with the added notability he has from the observatory etc. Please give me a few days and I will go over the page. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please revise

Please include a cite to his PhD thesis, ideally an online pdf or if not that then a link to a copy at the library of his uni.
Vienna University should either be "University of Vienna" per the WP, or the German language term.

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done both, @Ldm1954. Sgubaldo (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One more. I do not understand the placement of [1] after his name in the Career section, it seems to be misplaced. [2] has his parents info. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo, I have been slow. If you can fix this last one I will approve the GA. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954. [1] is to source that his middle name is Edwin, which [2] doesn't do. I've placed [2] at the end of that sentence too. Sgubaldo (talk) 20:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GAR section

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Arne Slettebak revitalised interest in the field of stellar rotation after it had been abandoned for nearly 15 years?

Source: Tassoul, Jean-Louis (2000). Stellar Rotation. Cambridge University Press. p. 4. ISBN 978-1-13-942832-3 – via Google Books.

Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by Sgubaldo (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Sgubaldo (talk) 01:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]