Talk:Armed Forces of the Dominican Republic

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force

Caribbean: Dominican Republic Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Dominican Republic portal This article is supported by WikiProject Dominican Republic (assessed as High-importance).

The entity is now called Ministry of Defense (Ministerio de Defensa) http://www.fuerzasarmadas.mil.do/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.163.163.158 (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: History section

"As a result of this historic event of our recent past..."

Is this section copy and pasted from some other source? It seems to be written from a first=person perspective. Also, the wording in that section in general seems pretty unclear.