Talk:Armed Forces Special Weapons Project/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 05:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

I'll get to this in the next couple of days.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Lede is too short.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Nimitz was an Admiral of the Fleet in US terminology. ISBN for Hansen 1995a is invalid, although the OCLC # is good. The link to United States (1978) is to the title and distribution pages (only) of the doc.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

1. Nimitz was a fleet admiral. Linked to US fleet admiral article.

I sit corrected.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

1. Corrected Hansen bibliographic entry
2. Substituted a new link to the History of the Custody and Deployment of Nuclear Weapons (U): July 1945 through September 1977
3. Expanded the introduction.

• All problems should be addressed now. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC)