Jump to content

Talk:Arkansas in the American Civil War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

The 3rd Arkansas section needs to be moved to a regimental page like the 1st Arkansas (Confederate) Scromett (talk) 16:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was no "Confederate Medal of Honor"

[edit]

The Confederate Medal of Honor is a postwar UDC creation as best I can tell, and was not named that either. Any references to it here are going to need citations from contemporary (not post-war) sources. Red Harvest (talk) 13:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the following:

The Confederacy had only one medal of valor to offer its soldiers in honor of heroism during the war. That medal, the Confederate Medal of Honor, was awarded to forty seven Arkansans for bravery in action. Few, if any, ever received the actual medal, as the Confederacy lacked the funds to produce them in great numbers. However, they did keep maticulous records of those awarded.

I'm not sure where it belongs in this article, but it is apparently a postwar award according to the link provided, and it did not use the name given here. It is not clear from the reference that the men listed were actually recorded by for the award by the CSA or if they were nominated by the UDC later. Understand that this is not an objection to the award itself nor a denial of the importance of the actions by the forty-seven. The context appears to be incorrect and requires some clean up by someone with more knowledge of the award. Red Harvest (talk) 23:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pike?

[edit]

Any reason Albert Pike isn't mentioned here under notables? 205.153.140.34 (talk) 22:54, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Arkansas in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Arkansas in the American Civil War's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "history-sites":

Reference named "nrhpinv":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 21:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Arkansas in the American Civil War's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "couchgenweb.com":

Reference named "csawardept.com":

Reference named "encyclopediaofarkansas":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 12:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Arkansas in the American Civil War's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "THE WAR OF THE REBELLION 1898, Page 901":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 00:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.couchgenweb.com/civilwar/45milf&s.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Hog Farm Talk 03:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]