Jump to content

Talk:Arjun Singh (Congress politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Protect this please

[edit]

Arjun Singh is involved in a recent controversy, so it would be better for wikipedia to protect this page for some time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.72.40 (talk) 01:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Just now I saw the line "He has sex with dogs". Please protect to prevent such vandalism.

Please sign your comments. Anyways, we only protect articles that are being vandalized constantly. If we did, it would also protect against valuable contributions from anonymous readers and newly registered accounts. Psychless 18:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Income tax Defaulter

[edit]

Provide link for this

Down with Arjun Singh!

[edit]

{deleted}

PS: It was only my respect for Wikipedia that kept me from posting these comments in the main article.

POV remark

[edit]

There is specifically one remark that is obviously POV, but I also believe that the whole second paragraph may be POV. Specifically, {deleted} is obviously POV. The whole paragraph above that may also be POV, was there "a lot of controversy"? I don't know about Indian politics, so I can't really judge this issue. Aggelophoros 22:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it drew a lot of controversy. Its the news every other day and proof of the extreme reaction is this page's history itself. See how many times I have reverted inflammatory comments from this article. You managed to catch this before I can correct. I have removed the last edit however I am leaving the POV section template till I can rewrite it to POV free state. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:45, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done it. Removing POV bits from the intro also. Leaving a mention of the Churhat lottery scandal, I think, but mentioning that it was just an allegation. Hornplease 07:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Let both sides of the tale be known!

[edit]

The way Ambuj Saxena is removing any and every article edit that shows the HRD minister in a poor light makes me wonder if the editor himself is adherent to the concept of NPOV.

I agree that derogatory and abusive language is not the way to go in Wikipedia. But genuine criticism should not be edited just for the need of portraying the minister as an angel. Let us accept the fact that Arjun Singh is no Messiah for the backward classes; he stated it very poignantly in media that he played the current political master-stroke to further the interests of Congress party.

So dear Ambuj, unless you have a vested interest in portraying him as an angel, allow for facts other than the sugary introduction highlighting his one time felicitation as an outstanding parliamentarian.

{deleted} —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.101.16.235 (talk • contribs).

Dear editor,
I have no vested interests in portraying Arjun Singh in either good light or bad light. Unfortunately all the edits reverted by me were totally attacking and hence unencyclopedic making them unfit to be added here. If you add facts (and not views), there is nobody who will revert your edits. If someone does, I promise that I will revert them back. We are free to hold our views on any topic. But we should let Wikipedia reflect NPOV as Wikipedia is not a soapbox for political views. If you want to contact me personally regarding any protest, et al., you can contact me by E-mail. BTW, if you want to know my views on the issue, you can check my orkut profile, the link of which can be found on my userpage. Hope that you contribute to Wikipedia constructively from now onwards. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 18:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done Anbuj

Removed resignation of Knowledge commission members

[edit]

Horplease, The resignation of the Knowledge Commission members is irrelevant to this article.

Arjun Singh: curse to India

[edit]

{deleted}

What about Arjun's Singh's misconduct during Bopal gas problem where he was CM? Please write that here

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition

[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag TALK2ME 08:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun Singh = Arj Barker, shouldn't this be spotlighted at top of page121.222.255.237 (talk) 10:17, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Paul R[reply]

Do not discuss apart WP:TPG

[edit]

Please avoid to put information on talk pages or anywhere on Wikipedia, that is unacceptable and falls under

for more awareness about how to behave at talk pages, please go for WP:TPG - --Dr.pragmatist (talk) 16:48, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirm neutrality

[edit]

During bhopal gas tradgedy he was the person who order then collector to evacuate Warren Anderson out of bhopal --Pmpbot (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Arjun Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Arjun Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arjun Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 page move against consensus

[edit]

@Abhishek0831996: The reason for this - "Arjun Singh (Madhya Pradesh politician)" is because this - "Arjun Singh (West Bengal politician)" exists, and both are Indian politicians. Perhaps you need to move it back and request a WP:RM first. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:43, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Abhishek0831996: repinged - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Abhishek0831996: See this revision, there is another one from Himachal Pradesh. I'd personally prefer birth years, but the consensus seems to be suing birth place/state. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Arjun_Singh_(Congress_politician)&oldid=1264307937"