Talk:Ariel Pink/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Ariel Pink. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Is this for real?
Is it just me, or does this whole page read like fiction? It seems more like someone trying to be funny than a real biography. IE: "After a brief shopping mall tour in 2000...", "Pink was brought-up on charges of incinerating a homeless man", "It was also during this time that Pink was arrested in a public restroom, along with Leonardo DiCaprio and Kevin Fiderline for indecent exposure", "He would not leave his mansion nor would he take off a Freddy Kreuger costume he had. I'm the real Freddy! was supposedly all he could repeat."SteubenGlass (talk) 10:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Never mind, i reverted it. All the ludicrous statements were added at one time by the same person, appartently it was vandalism.SteubenGlass (talk) 10:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Notability
I think the questionable notability tag need not be applied to this article. Ariel Pink has released on the Animal Collective-run, independent, fairly notable Paw Tracks record label. He has been featured in the New York Times [1], the Washington Post [2], as well as several student newspapers such as the Michigan Daily [3] and independent music press such as Pitchfork Media [4][5][6]. Rezzu (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Outsider music category
Uhh, really? I'd say Ariel Pink is pretty far from outsider music. hotdiggitydogs (talk) 06:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Uhh, I think someone who sits in a room for years recording hundreds of songs onto a 4-track, playing multiple instruments and making beats with his mouth and armpits would classify as an Outsider musician... Furthermore, most of his commercial releases are just reissues of this home-recorded material, before which he was selling them as CDRs with the help of R. Stevie Moore. (75.172.121.136 (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC))
hauntology
I think the hauntology link should be re-included see also http://delicious.com/roreo/hauntology+music [garden-as-cemetery] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.31.174.196 (talk) 21:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Chillwave?
The page states in the first sentence that Ariel Pink is sometimes associated with the chillwave scene. The cited article doesn't even mention chillwave. I don't think chillwave should be mentioned here, or, at the very least, a more relevant reference should be added. Wikiisawesome (talk) 12:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Plaster cast
Ariel Pink has been cast by Cynthia Plaster Caster.[7] I'd like to include it but I can't find a spot.--Auric talk 15:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Relationship Status
I removed the section in the biography about his relationship status. The line was too conversational, and the link to the reference 404'ed
- ″He currently lives alone and is open to applications.[1]″
BobPeck (talk) 18:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Here's a link to an archived version: [8]--Auric talk 15:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
References
- ^ Zine, Venus (2010-04-08). "Forget Hot Tub Time Machine, here's Geneva Jacuzzi!". Venus Zine. Retrieved 2012-04-04.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Ariel Pink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110708170106/http://prod1.cmj.com/articles/display_article.php?fid=69547631 to http://prod1.cmj.com/articles/display_article.php?fid=69547631
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Genre sources
The infobox is getting cluttered with citations which simply categorize Pink one way or another and don't seem particularly informational otherwise, so I'm relocating them here:
- Psychedelic pop[1][2]
- lo-fi[3][4][5]
- avant-garde pop[6][7]
- experimental[8][9]
- hypnagogic pop[10][11]
References
- ^ "REVIEW: ARIEL PINK, POM POM". Pretty Much Amazing. 17 November 2014. Retrieved 30 January 2015.
- ^ Exclaim
- ^ Henderson, Alex. "Ariel Pink's Haunted Graffiti | Biography | AllMusic". AllMusic. Retrieved December 15, 2014.
- ^ i-D | VICE
- ^ The Observer
- ^ The New York Times
- ^ NME
- ^ "Ariel Pink's Haunted Graffiti".
- ^ "Experimental-Pop in Bayern".
- ^ Keenan, Dave (2009). "Childhood's End". The Wire. No. 306.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Ryce, Andrew. "RA Reviews: Ariel Pink's Haunted Grafitti - Mature Themes". Resident Advisor. Retrieved 4 June 2016.
GentleCollapse16 (talk) 00:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ariel Pink/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Czar (talk · contribs) 02:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Nicely done, @Ilovetopaint, particularly the scaffolding. Some comments:
- Use "Pink" instead of "Rosenberg"
People who are best known by a pseudonym should be subsequently referred to by their pseudonymous surnames
— MOS:SURNAME
- But he's quoted in the article saying that "Ariel Pink" is not supposed to be a pseudonym.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- I have another bullet point on this below. Gist is that if "Ariel Pink" is his common name in the sources and thus the article title, then he's better known by the pseudonym and per the quoted guideline, would be "Pink" throughout the piece czar 01:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Gonna reach out to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies for this one --Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Side note: Kind of interesting that the article's quoted elements (which I still hope will be paraphrased) all refer to him as Pink czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Done Checked the liner notes for the original albums and found that he's been calling himself "Ariel Pink" since as early as 2001. --Ilovetopaint (talk) 15:10, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Side note: Kind of interesting that the article's quoted elements (which I still hope will be paraphrased) all refer to him as Pink czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Gonna reach out to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies for this one --Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- I have another bullet point on this below. Gist is that if "Ariel Pink" is his common name in the sources and thus the article title, then he's better known by the pseudonym and per the quoted guideline, would be "Pink" throughout the piece czar 01:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- But he's quoted in the article saying that "Ariel Pink" is not supposed to be a pseudonym.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Combine parentheses in first sentence of lede (Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies#Examples)
- Direct quotations overused throughout—can afford greater paraphrase here, which would amplify the effect of the quotes that remain
- Really, at least a half or closer to 3/4 or nearly all of the quotes can/should be paraphrased
- I planned to work on that when I have the time--Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- I thought the article was passable without it, but others will take umbrage for reasons of copyright, so I recommend reducing it sooner than later. (The audio fair use rationale updates mentioned below are similarly urgent.) czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- I planned to work on that when I have the time--Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Disambig Anthrax
- Watch consecutive sentences that use "He" instead of Pink
- uninterested more precise than disinterested (which more often describes unbiased interest than lack of interest)
- wikify music jargon: amp, cassette, CD-R, eight-track
- '96: use straight apostrophe
- "ultimately accumulated between 200 and 300 cassette tapes of material"—as of when? misleading if not referring solely to his pre-college output (in which case, can move to later ¶)
- Done all above--Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- reduce undue emphasis on "The Last Art Piece" (e.g., instead call it one of his art pieces, a three-foot-tall mural that ... led an administrative member to unsuccessfully sue the school for sexual harassment) just make it more concise to attract less attention
- Done? --Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- missing closing quotation mark at that ¶'s end
- Beachwood not Beechwood
- "Recalling the time" awk, rephrase
- "widely distributed," needs period
- " personality-- the album" use {{em dash}} (two examples later too)
- "karaoke style" hyphenate
- 'contempt.").' lose double punctuation or simply recast
- "not being very good" meaning what? at performing or playing or poor songwriting?
- "don't get paid, So I can't" punctuation
- "two more of his previous" → "two of his previous"
- Done all above--Ilovetopaint (talk) 12:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- the Tim Koh quote needs more than a colon (this is still prose)
- 'Pitchfork awarded it the accolade of "Best New Music".' recast to be less hagiographic, e.g., Pitchfork highlighted the album as among the year's best. (or best of new releases, something to this effect)
- "the number one track" → "the year's best track"
- "newly-recorded" -ly adverbs don't need hyphen
- again, these quotes need to be paraphrased: for concision, clarity, copyright
- 'he said "I could dissolve' comma between
- by the Sperske lawsuit line, the reader hasn't retained Sperske's identity so introduce with the epithet of "drummer" or something more crafty
- "A court settlement was eventually reached" invert to rmv passive voice
- some of these reviewer quotes would be block quotes, but there's no editorial need to quote at this length
- "which rose to number 150" readers who jump to this paragraph will need a little more context
- "its credit and his last" recast so the subjects are clear
- "Rosenberg reported to the" he didn't report but he "told" surely
- Done all above --Ilovetopaint (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- paraphrase this whole "man everyone hates" incident—it reads as tabloids, just get to the basics without the mudslinging
- not sure how? The reader will want to know what the specific comments were.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- That's partially the point—as an encyclopedia, we're looking to paraphrase the dispute, not offer a blow-by-blow unless the dispute is some fundamental aspect of the biography (which it isn't, in this case). For instance, drop the primary source refs and summarize the secondary source coverage, which likely doesn't do a blow-by-blow either. I can take a rough stab if wanted. czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Done? I summarized the last quote in that paragraph. But I think what you're asking is to remove the comments from Faster Louder because it's not a "fundamental aspect" of the story ... even though the story is about those comments? I don't see the logic there.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- That's partially the point—as an encyclopedia, we're looking to paraphrase the dispute, not offer a blow-by-blow unless the dispute is some fundamental aspect of the biography (which it isn't, in this case). For instance, drop the primary source refs and summarize the secondary source coverage, which likely doesn't do a blow-by-blow either. I can take a rough stab if wanted. czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- not sure how? The reader will want to know what the specific comments were.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- "Brooklyn based" hyphenate
- "a four-star review" out of what?
- "Goldner reviewed that the album" awk
- Done all above--Ilovetopaint (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- "Rosenberg intimated that his desire" is this original research or does the source make this claim?
- It does: "In interviews around this record, he has sounded weary and reserved by comparison, insisting he doesn’t want attention or care about releasing records anymore. Mostly he talks about Jameson." --Ilovetopaint (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- Portastudio proper noun
- disambig Spencer Clark and lose the comma
- Done all above--Ilovetopaint (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- the Haunted Graffiti section can be incorporated into the general band history above (and if it's meant as a point about his rightful surname, our sources call him Ariel Pink, which is used as the article title, his common name, hence why Pink becomes the surname for subsequent use)
- Done / Not done I moved some of it to the general history. I don't think the article would benefit not having a dedicated subheader explaining the meaning of "Ariel Pink" and "Ariel Pink's Haunted Graffiti".--Ilovetopaint (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- I can see the virtue of the separate call-out if it were instead a kind of personal history section on his identity, but in terms of the band's history and its portrayal in sources, the article is already mostly a history of that moniker (for which he is best known) hence why it makes sense to cover in the existing section. I'm not adamant, but that's the logic. czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Done --Ilovetopaint (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- I can see the virtue of the separate call-out if it were instead a kind of personal history section on his identity, but in terms of the band's history and its portrayal in sources, the article is already mostly a history of that moniker (for which he is best known) hence why it makes sense to cover in the existing section. I'm not adamant, but that's the logic. czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Done / Not done I moved some of it to the general history. I don't think the article would benefit not having a dedicated subheader explaining the meaning of "Ariel Pink" and "Ariel Pink's Haunted Graffiti".--Ilovetopaint (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- some of these publications in the references should be wikified when applicable (the guardian, fact uk magazine)
- metacritic ref doesn't need cbs interactive and paste doesn't need wolfgang's vault—the work title is sufficient and publisher field is predominantly for books
- consider pulling out the external links into {{external media}} for use within the article
- |state=expanded for ariel pink navbox
- rmv links to Atheif (circular redirects)
- lede: 'he is frequently cited as the "godfather"' frequently? article only cites one instance
- Done all above --Ilovetopaint (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- lede could stand to be expanded with mentions of the effects of his other major albums
- Not done outside of The Doldrums and Before Today? I'm not aware of how the other albums were influential. --Ilovetopaint (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- The lede doesn't appear to properly attribute Animal Collective/The Doldrums for launching his career, as it reads more like the album was released on their label and his popularity just ambiently grew afterwards. But you know the source material better. His last two albums charted so I would mention them by name as having been released, even if you feel there is nothing specifically remarkable about their contents or reception. Not adamant about that either, though. Might also be worth describing the aspects of his personal for which he is best known ("the ... retro, androgynous, psychedelic image that would mark Ariel Pink out in the 00s") czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- [re: "ambiently grew afterwards"] Yes, that's correct.
- [re: "last two albums"] No, Mature Themes charted too, and I think it's been more or less forgotten. I would have thought Pom Pom might deserve a mention in the lead, but I couldn't find anything about it that stood out. I don't feel it's encyclopedic to mention albums in the lead just for the sake of mentioning them.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- [re: "retro, androgynous"] I recall many interviews that characterize him as "flamboyant", "opinionated", or a "freak", but there would've been no encyclopedic way to incorporate those sources in the article without creating WP:SYNTH or an awkward paragraph like "John Doe feels Rosenberg is 'flamboyant' while Jane Doe thought he was 'a freak' [...]". --Ilovetopaint (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- The lede doesn't appear to properly attribute Animal Collective/The Doldrums for launching his career, as it reads more like the album was released on their label and his popularity just ambiently grew afterwards. But you know the source material better. His last two albums charted so I would mention them by name as having been released, even if you feel there is nothing specifically remarkable about their contents or reception. Not adamant about that either, though. Might also be worth describing the aspects of his personal for which he is best known ("the ... retro, androgynous, psychedelic image that would mark Ariel Pink out in the 00s") czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Not done outside of The Doldrums and Before Today? I'm not aware of how the other albums were influential. --Ilovetopaint (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- no mention of drugs in the lede? it's a major theme throughout the rest of the article
- Not done what is there to say? --Ilovetopaint (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- From what I read, I was drawing a connection between his prolific period and his drug use, but not sure if that's reflected in the sources. If indeed it was a major factor of his songwriting process, that would be the context for the lede mention. czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- I think I included every source that mentions his past with drugs. It's not discussed often even though it seems like it is/was a big part of his life. --Ilovetopaint (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- From what I read, I was drawing a connection between his prolific period and his drug use, but not sure if that's reflected in the sources. If indeed it was a major factor of his songwriting process, that would be the context for the lede mention. czar 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Not done what is there to say? --Ilovetopaint (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
GA criteria
- Well written: Mostly. Great structure, clear, mostly concise, some minor stuff noted above. Most glaring/dire issue is the overquoting, which should be addressed ASAP. The GA prose bar is low enough that this passes without the changes, but hope it will warrant your attention nonetheless.
- Refs good, lowest quality refs are interview sources. No copyvio via Earwig but plenty of overquoting (see above) to be fixed. Ran other tools.
- Breadth: Addresses subject's early life, work, reception, legacy without delving into unnecessary detail.
- Neutral, with some points on weight noted above
- Stable
- Free image rights look good (hey look I transferred File:Ariel Pink circa 2010.jpg) but the fair use rationales on the two audio files are junk. You'll need to transfer WP:NFCC#8 contextual significance details from the in-article audio captions to the FUR templates themselves. I personally don't see the justification for the Among Dreams sample based on the given text, but I'll let you make a better case for that if you want. The Round and Round sample at least has the backing of being a definitive moment in his sound, by one reviewer's account. Again, the fair use templates on the audio file page need to reflect the NFCC reasoning behind its inclusion, or what does the audio provide that cannot be provided from paraphrased text alone, and what sourcing warrants the importance of this specific clip? Likely won't keep both clips either unless there is a strong case for both of their non-free use.
- I don't know how the audio samples fail NFCC#8. The first sample illustrates his lo-fi sound, the second sample illustrates his more professional sound, neither of which can be done with text. The choice to use "Among Dreams" was arbitrary but virtually any track from his early cassettes would have been valid for the sourced claim ("drums simulated with mouth").--Ilovetopaint (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
✓ Pass czar 02:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Ariel Pink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for discorder.citr.ca/features/06ariel.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100712225211/http://www.4ad.com:80/ariel-pinks-haunted-graffiti/news/~round-and-round/ to http://4ad.com/ariel-pinks-haunted-graffiti/news/~round-and-round/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100423214229/http://www.4ad.com:80/ariel-pinks-haunted-graffiti/news/~announce-album-d/ to http://4ad.com/ariel-pinks-haunted-graffiti/news/~announce-album-d/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I do not know how to do this but I was updating this page because it mentions nothing of his controversies which are widely known otherwise just not on this page. I added the many controversies listing them off and they were taken down for being... controversial??
How am I supposed to make this stick? thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.129.104.98 (talk) 03:33, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Controversy section
Hello! I do not know how to do this but I was updating this page because it mentions nothing of his controversies which are widely known otherwise just not on this page. I added the many controversies listing them off and they were taken down for being... controversial??
How am I supposed to make this stick? thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.129.104.98 (talk) 03:33, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Rocker dropped by label Mexican Summer
Currently dropped by Mexican Summer per news from Variety via Yahoo. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 12:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- This has been mentioned in Ariel_Pink#Bobby_Jameson_and_Mexican_Summer_remasters (the last parapgraph). --Λeternus (talk) 12:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)