Talk:Ari Ben-Menashe/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Ari Ben-Menashe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Maxwell

Robert, my understanding of the allegation was that Maxwell was an agent, not an informant. Have you seen him described specifically as an informant? SlimVirgin ^(talk) 19:00, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

It seemed to me the article Mordechai Vanunu was indicating that Maxwell was an informant. Having him as an agent seemed implausible at first but I stand corrected on the claim - ie, agent is correct it seems Robertbrockway 05:05 May 15, 2005 (UTC)

The distinction tends to be that an informant is not paid, though it varies from country to country. In the UK, the intelligence services apparently won't even buy an informant a cup of tea, in case any allegations about expenses are made, because as soon as payment is made, certain responsibilities apparently kick in toward the informant, and/or the information might be seen to be tainted. An agent, on the other hand, is generally understood to be someone who receives expenses or even a regular fee. An officer is a paid employee. My understanding is that Ben-Menashe was claiming of Maxwell that he was on the payroll as an agent. He produced no evidence, however, and Maxwell didn't need money, so it's not at all clear that any of it's true, or that these rigid agent/informant distinctions are always applicable. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 08:10, May 15, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks SlimVirgin. I now see I was misunderstanding the use of the term agent Robertbrockway 08:29 May 15, 2005 (UTC)

Who is afraid of Ari Ben-Menashe?

Posted by Mulla Nasrudin 12 December 2005

Ari Ben-Menashe never claimed, as attributed to the White House reporter Steven Emerson on this Wiki article, to have personally planted the homing device that enabled Israeli bunker buster bombs to destroy the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq. Ben-Menashe says in his book, Profits of War, that some French nuclear technicians recruited by Mossad planted the device, while the plant was being built by the French government, a claim accepted in Israel itself. He also says that although an Iraqi Jew he has never been to Iraq (he was born in Iran, where the Jewish population is not Sephardic). How could he have made the claim reported by Emerson, where or when was it made? Emerson is either mistaken or is deliberately spreading disinformation on Ben-Menashe. This single VERIFIABLE fact makes me wonder why the page on Ben-Menashe in Wiki reads like the zionist anti Ben-Menashe websites; an example of which is this:

http://www.aijac.org.au/review/2003/284/b-menash-davis.html

Since all anti Ben-Menashe websites are Zionist-Neocon sites, and George Bush senior particularly wanted this man discredited and destroyed, it is not far fetched or outrageous to believe that this Wiki page has been written by a Zionist neocon.

If this is not true dear author, then please show evidence to back up Emerson's accusations. Where and when did Ari B-M make all those absurd claims?

If the Emerson claims are untrue then how many other untruths are on that page? Why was there no cross references with his book 'Profits of War' and why are there no quotes from numerous journalists (Seymour Hersh included) who still believe he was telling the truth?

Some of the links below have now suddenly appeared as reference links in the Wiki article to give an appearance of balance but they are not quoted in the main body of text; which only lists negative rumours about him.

http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/1992/42/42p9.htm http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/vanunu.html

Also the Ben-Menashe court case in the US is reported very badly on the article. The American and Israeli governments claimed in court (under oath) that he was a low level Farsi translator with no access to secrets, but his 4 passports showed he had made dozens of foreign trips to Nicaragua, Peru and Poland as well the US every year, his pay slips sent from Israel by some supporters showed expenses claims running into hundreds of thousands and paid by the security services. This information could be verified from the court records and will be proof of a conspiracy against this individual.

Furthermore, those who have actually read Ben-Menashe's book, would say that he had not said that Mossad killed Maxwell, this is an out and out lie and/or factual error which I have been unable to correct on the Wiki page as it does not allow me to make corrections. Basically, because the then British Transport Minister, Malcolm Rifkind refused to allow a post-mortem on Maxwell, some people were led to believe that he was covering up for Israel as he was Jewish. Ben-Menashe however by publishing the Israeli government pathologist's report on the back page of his book stating that Maxwell's injuries were not consistent with falling off a yacht and that he had probably been murdered, was letting the world know that this could not have been the work of the 'Kidon' as they spend the first year of their training with pathologists and do not leave tell-tale marks. He also gave the motive for the murder, £350 million dollars, the CIA's share of the profits of the arms sales to Iran which were kept in in a Polish bank account and given to Maxwell to give to the CIA. The money disappeared in the black hole of Mawell's accounts. Further allegations regarding the murder of Olof Palme, the Swedish Prime minister, and the suspicious deaths of the Israeli Amiram Nir and the US Senator John Towers give a hint of why it is so important for some members of the establishment in the US to discredit Ari Ben Menashe.

As regards the lie detector section; if you actually read what Unger wrote http://www.publiceye.org/rightwoo/rwooz9-50.html you can see that what he meant was not that Ben-Menashe is a lier but that there are those who will attempt to destroy your career if you quote him, and that this is what happened to Hersh. Here is a link to an article by Jack Colhoun that tells you more:

http://www.consortiumnews.com/1999/101499a.html

The section on Maxwell should be dealing with the PROMIS scandal, the first Trojan piece of software that was sold to Jordan and elsewhere and led to the Israeli assasination of many PLO members. Here is what the CIA had to say:

http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/INSLAW/inslaw_hr.summary instead of this type of info, the Maxwell section has a whole lot of nonesensical detail not related to Ari Ben-Menashe.

This is a review of Ben-Menashe's book: http://www.radioislam.org/historia/zionism/benmenashe_bleier.html by Ronald Bleier, New York, N.Y. which appeared in Middle East Policy Volume II, [Winter] 1993, Number 3, pp. 169-172.

More from Mulla

Also the Ben-Menashe court case in the US is reported very badly on the article. The American and Israeli governments claimed in court (under oath) that he was a low level Farsi translator with no access to secrets, but his 4 passports showed he had made dozens of foreign trips to Nicaragua, Peru and Poland as well the US every year, his pay slips sent from Israel by some supporters showed expenses claims running into hundreds of thousands and paid by the security services. This information could be verified from the court records and will be proof of a conspiracy against this individual.

Furthermore, those who have actually read Ben-Menashe's book, would say that he had not said that Mossad killed Maxwell, this is an out and out lie and/or factual error which I have been unable to correct on the Wiki page as it does not allow me to make corrections. Basically, because the then British Transport Minister, Malcolm Rifkind refused to allow a post-mortem on Maxwell, some people were led to believe that he was covering up for Israel as he was Jewish. Gordon Thomas by publishing the Israeli government pathologist's report on the back page of his book, Robert Maxwell: Israel's Superspy, stating that Maxwell's injuries were not consistent with falling off a yacht and that he had probably been murdered, was letting the world know that this could not have been the work of the 'Kidon' as they spend the first year of their training with pathologists and do not leave tell-tale marks. And A B-M gave the motive for the murder, £350 million dollars, the CIA's share of the profits of the arms sales to Iran which were kept in in a Polish bank account and given to Maxwell to give to the CIA. The money disappeared in the black hole of Mawell's accounts. Further allegations regarding the murder of Olof Palme, the Swedish Prime minister, and the suspicious deaths of the Israeli Amiram Nir and the US Senator John Towers give a hint of why it is so important for some members of the establishment in the US to discredit Ari Ben Menashe.

As regards the lie detector section; if you actually read what Unger wrote http://www.publiceye.org/rightwoo/rwooz9-50.html you can see that what he meant was not that Ben-Menashe is a lier but that there are those who will attempt to destroy your career if you quote him, and that this is what happened to Hersh. Here is a link to an article by Jack Colhoun that tells you more:

http://www.consortiumnews.com/1999/101499a.html

The section on Maxwell should be dealing with the PROMIS scandal, the first Trojan piece of software that was sold to Jordan and elsewhere and led to the Israeli assasination of many PLO members. Here is another document for those that need detail:

http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/INSLAW/inslaw_hr.summary instead of this type of info, the Maxwell section has a whole lot of nonesensical detail not related to Ari Ben-Menashe.

This is a review of Ben-Menashe's book: http://www.radioislam.org/historia/zionism/benmenashe_bleier.html by Ronald Bleier, New York, N.Y. which appeared in Middle East Policy Volume II, [Winter] 1993, Number 3, pp. 169-172.

Without going into detail, the above is nonsense. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

But I do give references. Here is some detail: A B-M has never said that he planted the homing device in Osirak, see his book Profits of War, he also does not say that he led the raid on Entebbe, ditto reference, Investigation by Gary Sick showed that George Bush's alibi, that he had been in Washington on the day that A B-M alleged to have seen him in a Paris hotel, had come from The Zionist Organisation of America, who said that he had been addressing their meeting on that day, there had in fact been no such meeting. There is a book on this subject called 'Trick or Treason' by Robert Parry available from Amazon, all possible detail you may want is here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/187982308X/002-5162073-6354400?v=glance&n=283155 By constantly erasing my posts and claiming that they have no reference or detail whilst posting allegation after allegation without references or any basis except that were said by your friend Steven Emerson, (statements which can easily proven to be false since there is no record that A B-M made them) you are showing that you are not objective. Initially I wrote in the page that you had got A b-M's nationality wrong; you had him down as an Iranian Jew instead of an Iraqi Jew, you erased my comment regarding this mistake from the Wiki page and wrote threatening notes to me but then went back and sneakily and corrected your error! Why don't you do this to the rest of the article? I am not saying that what I have written is true in itself but it is what Ben Menashe says in his book, this is verifiable unlike the allegations which you make against him. Here is an interview with A B-M printed in an Iranian opposition newspaper and the recording of the interview is avalable on the net as an MP3. http://membres.lycos.fr/abasiran/iran7.html But can I post this on the A B-M Wiki page? No! Slim Virgin will not allow it, only unsubstantiated (and verifiably wrong) statements attributed to Steven Emerson are allowed to appear. Mulla Nasrudin 17 Feb

Complaint from OTRS

the page is still full of errors and misquotations from Ari Ben-Menashe. A great deal of untrue statements are attributed to him, statements that he has not made and could not have made. No references for these are given except that say Steven Emerson says that AB-M said this or that, , Steven Emerson for his part does not say where he has read or heard theses statements... There is a statement that AB-M says that Robert Maxwell was killed by Mossad, this is contrary to what ABM says in his book. Surely AB-M's book should be the reference for what he has said or not said, not hearsay from some White House crony.

Could posters please sign their posts? Many thanks, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Since this is a message received from OTRS (the Wikimedia Foundation's email system), there is no point that I should sign it, because it of course does not reflect my opinions, but those of whoever sent the mail. Do you have a problem with that? David.Monniaux 09:11, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi David, it wasn't directed at you or that post, but at Mulla Nasrudin, who rarely signs posts. When you say "do you have a problem with that," can you say what you mean exactly? SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:02, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Mulla again

Below is something written by Jack Colhoun, which alleges that Steven Emerson was spreading disinformation on Ari Ben-Menashe on behalf of his friends in the White House:

October 14, 1999 Israeli Spy Cover-up Crumbles By Jack Colhoun

On Nov. 3, 1989, Ari Ben-Menashe was taking a shower at a friend's house in Los Angeles when the police arrived. They ordered the dripping-wet Israeli to step out of the shower.

After letting Ben-Menashe dress, the police took the stunned world traveler into custody. He was charged with violating the U.S. Arms Export Control Act by trying to sell three C-130 transport planes to Iran with a false end-user certificate.

Ben-Menashe would later describe his reaction to his arrest as disbelief. He considered himself a significant player in the world of intelligence, skipping around the globe for more than a decade, putting together arms deals that the Israeli government favored and disrupting those that Israel opposed.

Though little understood at the time, the arrest also created a dangerous moment for a slew of top-secret U.S. and Israeli intelligence operations.

Behind the scenes, Israeli officials understood that Ben-Menashe's knowledge could be a serious threat, according to Gideon's Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad, a new book by British author Gordon Thomas.

Israeli leaders knew from debriefing legendary spymaster, Rafi Eitan, that Ben-Menashe had worked on some of Israel's most sensitive projects, Thomas reported based on his own interviews with Eitan.

"Rafi Eitan [told his Israeli debriefers] that Ari Ben-Menashe was in a position to blow wide open the U.S./Israeli arms-to-Iran network whose tentacles had extended everywhere: down to Central and South America, through London, into Australia, across to Africa, deep into Europe," Thomas wrote.

Indeed, Ben-Menashe possessed information that, if corroborated, could have shaken U.S.-Israeli relations and possibly destroyed the reputation of the sitting president of the United States, George Bush.

But Ben-Menashe kept quiet initially, assuming that the embarrassing arrest would be reversed. After he was transferred to the federal prison in New York City, Ben-Menashe waited for the Israeli government to set matters straight and arrange for his release.

Ben-Menashe soon discovered, however, that the Israeli government would not be coming to his rescue. So, finding himself in deep trouble and on his own, Ben-Menashe decided to talk with a few American reporters about what he knew. He began to tell a complex tale of international intrigue and arms-trafficking that involved top Israelis and senior U.S. officials.

Ben-Menashe's most dramatic claim was his insistence that he spotted Bush at a Paris meeting with Iranians in October 1980 as part of a covert Republican scheme to torpedo President Carter's negotiations for freeing 52 Americans then held hostage in Iran.

Ben-Menashe also implicated senior CIA official Robert Gates in the so-called "October Surprise" controversy as well as the Likud government of Menachem Begin, who apparently feared that a second Carter term would lead to a Palestinian state. [See David Kimche’s The Last Option.]

Beyond the Iran caper, Ben-Menashe dished up other juicy secrets. He described a clandestine U.S. policy to funnel weapons via Chile to Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

Ben-Menashe also claimed knowledge of Israeli intelligence penetration of the U.S. government at top levels, Israel's use of press magnate Robert Maxwell as a spy, and the distribution of rigged computer software to extract secrets from other governments.

All told, Ben-Menashe's accounts represented what could have been a major intelligence breach for both the Israeli and U.S. governments. If true, his information would literally rewrite the history of the Reagan-Bush era and expose President Bush, in particular, to charges of collaborating with Iranian terrorists to fix the outcome of the U.S. presidential election in 1980.

As the scope of Ben-Menashe's disclosures sank in, the Israeli government initiated a campaign to discredit him. Government officials began telling Israeli journalists that Ben-Menashe was "an imposter" who was fabricating his claims of official Israeli connections.

In a typical account, The Jerusalem Post quoted an "authoritative" source as stating that "the Defence establishment 'never had any contacts with Ari Ben-Menashe and his activities'." [The Jerusalem Post, March 27, 1990]

That initial cover story, however, crumbled when reporter Robert Parry obtained internal Israeli documents revealing that Ben-Menashe had worked from 1977-87 for an arm of Israeli military intelligence, called the External Relations Department.

Faced with those documents, the Israeli government retreated, admitting that the documents were real and that Ben-Menashe indeed had worked for Israeli intelligence. But authorities in Tel Aviv still tried to minimize Ben-Menashe's importance.

The Israeli government and the Bush administration grew more nervous after Ben-Menashe won acquittal from a federal jury in New York City on Nov. 28, 1990 -- in part because he established that he had performed intelligence work for Israel.

By early 1991, Israel and the White House were turning to their allies in the U.S. press for help. The hope was that friendly reporters could make Ben-Menashe into a laughingstock and consign his dangerous disclosures to the loony bin of conspiracy theories.

Steven Emerson, a New Republic writer with contacts inside the Likud, traveled to Israel where he was shown derogatory records about Ben-Menashe. Emerson returned to Washington and began ridiculing Ben-Menashe as "a low-level translator" who was "delusional."

Other U.S. reporters picked up the drumbeat of negative assessments about Ben-Menashe. On three consecutive weeks in fall 1991, Newsweek ran articles attacking Ben-Menashe's credibility. Emerson also repeated his critical reporting in stories for CNN, the Wall Street Journal’s editorial page and the American Journalism Review.

Despite the attacks, investigative journalist Seymour Hersh used Ben-Menashe as a source in Hersh's 1991 book about the Israeli nuclear program, The Samson Option.

Ben-Menashe provided details about the top-secret Israeli nuclear arsenal as well as Maxwell's intelligence activities, information that Hersh managed to corroborate with other sources. But even the renowned Hersh came under harsh criticism from fellow journalists for citing Ben-Menashe.

In 1992-93, a House task force, headed by Reps. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind., and Henry Hyde, R-Ill., buried Ben-Menashe even deeper when the panel rejected his allegations about the October Surprise case, including his eyewitness claim of seeing Bush in Paris.

The Hamilton-Hyde task force reached those conclusions despite contradictory testimony about Bush’s alibi for the weekend when Ben-Menashe and other witnesses placed Bush in Paris. [For details about the problems with Bush’s alibi and the gaps in the Hamilton-Hyde report, see Robert Parry’s Trick or Treason.]

Over the years, other witnesses added support to Ben-Menashe’s claims that he participated in clandestine Israeli intelligence operations. In the Israeli daily, Davar, reporter Pazit Ravina wrote, "in talks with people who worked with Ben-Menashe, the claim that he had access to highly sensitive intelligence information was confirmed again and again."

American journalist Craig Unger described similar information in The Village Voice. Unger quoted a senior intelligence official, Moshe Habroni, who stated that "Ben-Menashe served directly under me. … He had access to very, very sensitive material." [Village Voice, July 7, 1992]

Some of Ben-Menashe's key claims gained important factual corroboration, too. After dying mysteriously at sea, Maxwell was unmasked as an Israeli operative. In another instance, one of Ronald Reagan's national security aides, Howard Teicher, submitted an affidavit in a federal criminal case describing a CIA-backed covert operation to funnel military supplies through Chile to Iraq, just as Ben-Menashe had claimed.

Other new evidence supported the October Surprise charges. [For details, see Robert Parry's books, The October Surprise X-Files and Lost History.]

But the Washington news media did not reconsider its dismissive judgment of Ben-Menashe. That attitude has continued despite the additional corroboration of Ben-Menashe's bona fides published this year in Gideon's Spies.

Nevertheless, the book fills in an important new chapter of the Ben-Menashe saga: how alarmed Israeli intelligence officials understood the danger posed by Ben-Menashe's wide-ranging knowledge and how they mounted a disinformation campaign to discredit him.

Thomas's principal contribution to the Ben-Menashe puzzle comes from the author's interviews with Rafi Eitan, the Israeli master spy who engineered the capture of Nazi fugitive Adolph Eichmann in Argentine in 1960 and served as Mossad's deputy director of operations for 25 years.

In the interviews, Eitan, who is now in his mid-60s, acknowledged that Ben-Menashe was one of his protegés. According to Gideon's Spies, Eitan and Ben-Menashe worked together in the 1980s setting up a clandestine U.S.-Israeli arms network to procure weapons for sale to Iran.

Eitan also disclosed that he and Ben-Menashe collaborated on a project using so-called PROMIS software to collect sensitive intelligence about Israel's enemies in the Middle East.

Ben-Menashe has claimed he worked with Eitan on the top secret Joint Committee for Iran-Israel Relations, a combined effort by the Mossad and the External Relations Department to rebuild their influence in Iran after the overthrow of the Shah in 1979.

Ben-Menashe would have appeared a reasonable choice for the operation since he had been born in Iran, spoke fluent Farsi and was a contemporary of young Iranians rising to prominence under the Khomeini regime. But Thomas’s interviews with Eitan now corroborate those assertions.

So, in the early 1990s, while most U.S. and Israeli journalists were accepting the word of government sources and battering Ben-Menashe's credibility, the Israeli government knew from Eitan that Ben-Menashe's accounts were largely accurate, Thomas reported.

Asked for details about Eitan's confirmation of Ben-Menashe's intelligence role, Thomas told me that he had sent Eitan a copy of Ben-Menashe's 1992 memoirs, Profits of War. The book described Ben-Menashe's accounts of his intelligence exploits and his claim about the Republican-Israeli secret Iran-hostage collaboration in 1980.

Thomas said Eitan reported back that he had no criticism of the book. According to Thomas, Eitan stated that Ben-Menashe "is telling the truth. … That's why they squashed it." As for Ben-Menashe’s espionage skills, Eitan asserted that "as an intelligence operative, [he was] tops,” Thomas said.

In the 1980s, some of Eitan's most controversial work was as head of LAKAM, a military intelligence unit created to collect scientific and technological intelligence.

In one of Eitan's daring operations, the spymaster authorized recruitment of Jonathan Pollard, an American Jew who was a civilian intelligence analyst at the U.S. Navy's Anti-Terrorism Alert Center. Pollard was assigned to spy within the U.S. Defense Department and to steal sensitive U.S. documents.

"Over 1,000 highly classified documents, 360 cubic feet of paper, were transmitted to Israel," Thomas wrote. "There Rafi Eitan devoured them before passing over the material to the Mossad. The data enabled [its director general] Nahum Admoni to brief [Prime Minister] Shimon Peres … on how to respond to Washington's Middle East policies in a manner previously impossible."

But the operation backfired in 1985 when Pollard was arrested while fleeing to the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. The operation was traced to LAKAM, and Eitan was blamed for endangering U.S.-Israeli relations.

Apparently, Eitan was willing to disclose to Thomas other LAKAM-connected intelligence successes to offset the damage that the Pollard case has done to Eitan’s reputation.

In particular, Eitan touted an ingenious scheme for extracting secrets from the computerized files of other nations, an intelligence coup that Eitan saw as a crowning achievement to his career as Israel’s most famous spy.

According to Gideon’s Spies, Eitan confirmed Ben-Menashe's account that Israel reaped an intelligence bonanza by exploiting a sophisticated American software program called PROMIS. At the time, PROMIS was a state-of-art program capable of complex data management; it was designed to track the progress of federal criminal cases.

Eitan said he learned about PROMIS from Earl Brian, an American businessman who had been secretary of health and welfare under California Gov. Ronald Reagan in the early 1970s. Eitan knew of Brian because of the American's business trips to Iran in the 1970s.

According to Thomas's book, Eitan invited Brian to Tel Aviv, where they met "several times." Brian broached the subject of PROMIS software, which was already being employed by U.S. intelligence agencies.

Fascinated by the intelligence possibilities, Eitan brainstormed a plan to adapt PROMIS to Israeli intelligence needs. Eitan wanted to make PROMIS a cyber-age "Trojan Horse" that would glean secrets about Palestinian militants and political leaders from government files in Jordan and other nations.

Eitan soon got a copy of PROMIS from the United States, according to Gideon's Spies. Ben-Menashe claimed that he was instructed to arrange for the installation of a "trapdoor" or a "built-in chip" to permit the secret downloading of data.

Eitan's next task was to find a front company to sell PROMIS to Jordan. Since an Israeli company would not be trusted, "Earl Brian's company, Hadron, made the deal," Thomas wrote.

With PROMIS software installed in Jordan's military intelligence headquarters, Thomas reported, Eitan's strategy paid off in the downloading of sensitive information about Israel's adversaries.

"PROMIS could track a terrorist's every step," Thomas wrote. He called Eitan's project an intelligence "breakthrough" that enhanced his stature as "a powerful figure in the Israeli intelligence community." [In testimony, Brian denied a role in the PROMIS operation.]

Flush with success, Eitan decided to cast a wider net. Thomas reported that Eitan developed an ambitious plan to market PROMIS worldwide to Israel's allies and enemies alike. For that operation, Eitan needed a front company with greater international reach. So, he turned to press magnate Robert Maxwell and his access to world leaders.

"The power of his newspapers meant that presidents and prime ministers were ready to receive him," an Israeli intelligence official told Thomas. Maxwell also had close ties to top Israeli leaders and a formal relationship with the Mossad, according to Gideon’s Spies.

Soon, Maxwell was marketing the doctored software through Degem Computers, an Israeli company that Maxwell had purchased, Thomas reported. He added that Eitan's operation sold more than $500 million worth of PROMIS by 1989 to intelligence services in Australia, Great Britain, Canada, Guatemala, Poland, South Africa, South Korea and even the Soviet Union's KGB.

Though Thomas says he has corroborated parts of Eitan's assertions, some claims still rest heavily on Eitan's word. In studying the complicated PROMIS issue for several years, however, I have been able to confirm some additional elements of Eitan's account.

For example, the use of secret trapdoors to tap into a computer's files was a well-established practice by the early 1980s, according to papers prepared by U.S. military experts.

In an article in the Air University Review of January-February 1979, Lt. Col. Roger Schell described the techniques used by special U.S. Air Force teams to penetrate “secure” computer systems. Schell noted that the teams could install undetectable trapdoors to “bypass the normal security checks.”

Navy Lt. Philip Myers made a similar observation in a 1980 masters thesis in computer science written at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif. "The attacker can construct the trapdoor in such a manner as to make it virtually undetectable to even suspecting investigators," wrote Myers.

Myers also noted that trapdoors and "Trojan horses" can be "implemented in either hardware or software." The reference to the PROMIS trapdoor as a "built-in chip" suggests that the secret access could have been implanted in computer hardware that could then have been sold with the PROMIS software as a package deal.

I also discovered evidence of Brian's travels to Iran in the 1970s. I found proof, too, that Brian's Hadron was linked to U.S. intelligence and did top-secret work in Jordan.

Some information was in old newspapers. "Dr. Earl Brian reportedly is out to get a little of that Middle Eastern oil money," the Sacramento Bee reported on Jan. 12, 1975. "Brian, the secretary of the Health and Welfare agency under Ronald Reagan, is helping to write a proposal on health care for Iran."

I located other evidence at the National Archives in newly opened files from an investigation by Independent Counsel Jacob Stein who examined the personal finances of White House counselor Edwin Meese III. Brian was interviewed because in 1981, he had given Meese a $15,000 interest-free loan that Meese had used to buy stock in Brian's new Biotech Capital Corp.

Brian told one of Stein's investigators that he did "some corporate consulting" in Iran in the 1970s.

Brian also was president of the Los Angeles-based Xonics, Inc. in 1975-77. An FBI agent's memo to Stein described Xonics as a high-tech company with "several contracts with the Department of Defense and the CIA." Xonics specialized in telecommunications, radar techniques and X-ray imaging.

In 1978, Brian invested heavily in Hadron, a company based in Vienna, Va., that did high-tech communications and computer work for the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence. Two years later, Brian gained control of the company and began acquiring small firms with their own national-security contracts.

One of those purchases in December 1981 was Telcom, a communications engineering company that handled sensitive work for Jordan's armed forces and King Hussein. Telcom had a contract with the Royal Jordanian Air Force to set up a digital voice and microwave communications system, according to Hadron's Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in 1983.

Hadron's Form 10-K for 1984 described Telcom's upgrade of the communications system of the Jordanian Royal Palace in Amman. Telcom also operated the microwave network of the Special Communications Commission of the Jordanian Armed Forces.

In 1985, Hadron reported that Telcom personnel operated "a number of communications facilities" for "a proprietary U.S. Government agency," a phrase meaning an intelligence cut-out.

In other words, Eitan's account of Brian's activities would fit with the documentary evidence about Brian's businesses in the Middle East and in the United States. By the early 1980s, under Brian's guidance, Hadron had grown into a company with $30 million annual revenues, exclusively from national-security contracts.

[In 1996, Brian was convicted of fraud in an unrelated securities case and was sentenced to 4 ½ years in federal prison.]

Thomas told me that Eitan admitted that he was in direct contact with the developers of the original PROMIS software, a small Washington, D.C.-based company called Inslaw. Thomas said Eitan acknowledged that he was the mysterious Israeli who visited Inslaw's office in February 1983, using the name "Ben Orr."

Several years after the visit, Inslaw president William Hamilton learned from an Israeli journalist that Eitan sometimes called himself, "Dr. Joseph Ben Orr." After checking Eitan's photo, Hamilton and other members of his staff recognized Eitan as their visitor.

Wittingly or not, Ronald Reagan's Justice Department appeared to have facilitated that visit and Israel's procurement of PROMIS. In an ongoing federal claims case filed by Inslaw against the U.S. government for unauthorized use of PROMIS, a Justice Department official testified that he arranged for an Israeli official, called Ben Orr, to visit Inslaw and to receive a copy of PROMIS in May 1983.

Ben Orr "was a professor in Israel and expressed interest in case tracking," said C. Madison Brewer, the department's project manager for the PROMIS contract. "I made arrangements for him to go to Inslaw for a demonstration. … At a later date, he made a request for PROMIS," which Brewer said the Justice Department provided.

I asked Thomas why he thought Eitan was going public now with these disclosures. Thomas replied that Eitan simply considered his intelligence coups of the 1980s among his greatest professional triumphs and wanted credit.

"Rafi Eitan wants to leave a legacy that he was Israel's greatest spymaster since Gideon," said Thomas, referring to the Old Testament hero whose spying saved the Israelites from destruction. "He [Eitan] thinks what he created with PROMIS was the perfect climax to his career."

In asserting his claim to Gideon-like status, Eitan also burnished the reputation of his understudy, Ari Ben-Menashe. It now appears that Ben-Menashe, who lives in Canada, did possess real information despite the negative judgments by Congress and much of the Washington press corps.

Jack Colhoun, Ph.D., is an investigative reporter and a Cold War historian.

Please stop spamming this page with nonsense. If it continues, I will start deleting or archiving it immediately. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Please explain why this paragraph below is nonsense, is it because it disagrees with your assumptions? Keep on threatening.... it is all a handy record for a future court case. ( Signed:your beloved Mulla)