Talk:Argentina–Brazil relations

Brazil: Government and laws Top‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Government and Laws of Brazil task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Argentina Top‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentine politics. If you would like to participate, you can improve Argentina–Brazil relations, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map error

The colours in the map appear to be the wrong way around... the country in green is Argentina, and the country in orange is Brazil; however, the legend below identifies green with Brazil and orange with Argentina (logically, given their flag colours) 134.225.240.22 (talk) 16:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. The problem is due to the naming of the map image. For the template to work, the image needs to be renamed from "Brazil Argentina Locator" to "Argentina Brazil Locator". I've request the change in Commons, an admin should review it soon. Limongi (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Limongi (talk) 17:37, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 29 external links on Argentina–Brazil relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent years section tone?

I'm afraid I don't know enough to make any important changes, but I wanted to point out that in the "recent years" section of the article there is a sentence that doesn't appear to be written neutrally.

In the seventh paragraph: "(...) proof of the difficult relationship was shown during the inauguration of the Argentine president which Fernández was elected president of Argentina, displacing Mauricio Macri, Bolsonaro's right-wing ally, where he showed all his support during Macri's disastrous re-election campaign, where he was defeated by deep popular anger for his austerity policies and ineffective presidency."

I thought the reference at the end of the sentence was the source those claims, but there was no mention of the re-election. So my question is, should these comments remain as-is (and I'm worrying over nothing), be removed, or am I to look for references for them? Since I don't exactly know what to do I'll leave this message here in hopes of someone more knowledgeable in the Wikipedia ways appears. --Segaco1 (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard.

I just read and I agree with your comment (that's why I'm here). I think the paragraph Strained relations (2019-) is not neutral.

Especially the fact that the reference didn't supported the claims this paragraph made, makes my suspicious. I read the entire referenced article. The article was very critical of Bolsonaro, but did not mention the paragraph's content.

As I also don't have the knowledge concerning the topic to accurately edit the paragraph, I'd propose that the page must be edited by someone who has sufficient knowledge. The adding of extra references, which support the claims made is of course also possible. The other alternative is the removal of the paragraph. I think leaving it as it is not a desirable alternative. As was mentioned: the article doesn't appear neutral and, seen the lack of references, also not objective.

Not done for now: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. ℰmi1y_⧼T·C⧽ 11:32, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]