Talk:Area 51: An Uncensored History of America's Top Secret Military Base

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dubious tag

Hey, I don't edit much, I wasn't quite sure how to handle this. I just added a dubious tag for now. A recent edit basically inserted several oddly phrased lines attacking the book into the review section. No source, just a link in the text to a another website. From what I can tell, it was an unregistered user who has only made this one edit. I don't know if this is vandalism, an add, or just a good faith edit that was done in a somewhat confusing way, so I didn't want to mess with it beyond that. I haven't red this book, I don't know much of anything about the subject, i just stumbled here and found this weird, glaring change. Anybody, including the editor, who could weigh in here would be appreciated. 7Year Disciple (talk) 15:57, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Area 51: An Uncensored History of America's Top Secret Military Base. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110827083413/http://www.area51thebook.com:80/news-and-reviews/may-30-los-angeles-times-book-review-highly-readable-deeply-researched-chilling-depictions/ to http://www.area51thebook.com/news-and-reviews/may-30-los-angeles-times-book-review-highly-readable-deeply-researched-chilling-depictions/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits Required

Hi, I noticed the Security levels (TS/TSN etc) referred to are outdated and need correction. I don't have a source document to reference, so didn't make an actual edit. Cheers, Sass SassGrace (talk) 22:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]