Talk:Arden syntax

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Critical Evaluation

This article is well written with good introductory lines explaining the topic. It has obeyed the Wikipedia style and formatting guidelines in respect to bold title headings, linking technical terms to Wikipedia articles. Information in this article is accurate however not concise. The article also has several important external links named as Introduction to HL7, Open Source Arden Syntax compiler implementation with an Arden Syntax Example. However the structure of the article is not clear to the readers as it is lacking several headings, subheadings and Table of contents. Also various aspects of the topic are not covered.

Following are some of the suggestions that might be helpful in improving this article:

• I would recommend the last paragraph of the article relating to how Aden syntax got its name might have incorporated in to the introduction of the topic, so that its much clear to the readers.

• I would recommend adding more content to this article by saying advantages and limitations of Arden syntax in two separate headings.

• I would recommend a see also section, references and a further reading sections to this article.

• I would also recommend adding more information to the introduction of the topic as it is not clear to the readers.

I am a Health Informatics student at an Australian university in Melbourne currently working on Electronic Health Record project as part of my course work. I am interested in this article and I am willing to contribute to it over the next couple of months as a wiki editor.

Lakshmi Devineni (talk) 12:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi wiki editors, I have added several sections to the article. please let me know for any objections also planning to add more sections to the article in a couple of days Thanks. Lakshmi Devineni (talk) 08:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation

This is a very well written article with good depth of information. The author is very knowledgeable in the field of Arden Syntax and has referenced information frequently and in the correct manner. I really like the way you have split up the article into sections- it makes it easier to read, I can find what I specifically need quickly and it makes the article look a bit more interesting to the eye. The introduction to Arden Syntax has been worded clearly which makes the topic easier to understand. The 'Contents' box was a great addition as it showed the structure of the article and introduces us to the different sections. The 'Structure of Arden Syntax' section is very good, I like the way that the 3 categories have been sectioned and headed in bold- it makes them easier to read. If this section was not split up and did not have separate headings, it would be a heavy paragraph which would most likely get ignored by the reader. The way that the advantages and limitations have been split up are great, especially with the use of the bold dot points. This author has made an excellent effort and has delivered a professional and informative Wikipedia article. There are no further recommendations to be made Leah L Marino (talk) 11:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review

I have added some comments to Lakshmi Devineni's User talk page, and made some edits to article content on her sandbox page.Cathy Davis 5IHC (talk) 23:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks + Questions

I want to thank the author for this well written introduction. It is a compact an detailed overwiew of the topic and gave me some new impulses. I would like to add some references to technical aspects (i have to search my literature list first). One detail remains unclear to me (limitations): "...it allows usage of various operators and statements at the same time, leading to inconsistencies.". What does that mean, "at the same time"? What kind of inconsistencies could result? Another Question: I have seen that you study in Australia. Do you know about australian institutions that use Arden syntax? I am interested in experiences with routine use of Arden. Greetings, Iustus --IustusPeccator (talk) 09:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Arden syntax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Arden syntax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at La Trobe University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2013 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]