Talk:Arctic roll
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WPFood assessment
[edit]Low importance stub, regional variation on an ice cream cake. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 06:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Not in my school
[edit]Artic Roll (or Ice Cream in general) for a school dinner?
I don't think so! - Not at least in State schools.
Manufacturer
[edit]Walls do not make Arctic Roll and not done so for many years Hepatacyte 12:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
It's being made again now and being made by Birds Eye, although they've made it a bit healthier and altered them slightly, I just bought the chocolate one, it was nice, not amazing but nice, I always liked the rasberry one anyway and they didn't have that one in the supermarket :D They've changed the appearance slightly too. It's quite cheap so with the credit crunch cheap food sells! --Jannahred (talk) 18:07, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arctic roll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207213852/http://www.birdseye.co.uk/features/arctic-roll/ to http://birdseye.co.uk/features/arctic-roll/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 8 July 2017 (UTC)