Jump to content

Talk:Arctic Star

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Order of Wear

[edit]

Is this correct? According to the official Canadian, Australia and NZ orders of precedence, the Arctic Star comes between the Air Crew Europe Star and the Africa Star. I haven't found an official UK order of wear which lists it. Arthur R (talk) 12:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arthur. Yes. Between the Air Crew Europe Star and the Africa Star makes no sense. The top-ranking star is the 1939–1945 Star, the only one awarded for the full duration of the war, including the Pacific part. Second ranking, in order of institution, will be the Atlantic Star and Arctic star, both awarded for the full duration of the war in Europe. Following after that, all the other stars were for parts of the war, not for the full duration of the war, in order of their respective campaign start dates. I'm afraid someone guessed wrong about the position of the Arctic Star and the rest just followed suit without thinking it through. No campaign medal is listed in the UK order of wear, it just states "in order of the date of the campaign for which awarded". -- André Kritzinger (talk) 12:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

South Africa (Order of Wear)

[edit]

Is this really correct? The Arctic Star is a British medal, issued by the UK government, for service before 1952. It ought, then, to rank among the other WWII stars and medals, which follow the post-1952 awards awarded by the SA government. If it were to precede the SA Korea Medal, as shown, it would be separated from its WWII fellows, and imply that it was awarded by the SA government. Arthur R (talk) 12:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it does look silly. It's the result of a silly decision in 1952 to place all Brit awards instituted and awarded until then, from the George Cross down, after all South African awards. Everything instituted by the Queen after that, rank in their proper places. I talked to Prof Deon (DFS) Fourie about this, and we both agree that it's better to let sleeping dogs lie, in case the present powers get it into their heads to pull a similar stunt with the post-1994 awards... Still need to get hold of Fred Brownell, though, he'll have an answer. -- André Kritzinger (talk) 13:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Arthur, I had a long chat with Fred Brownell this afternoon, so some editing will follow soon. I sent him the link to the article to peruse first, though. -- André Kritzinger (talk) 17:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Arctic Star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arctic Star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]