Jump to content

Talk:Archpriest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: the first sentence in this article

[edit]

Is it not redundant to say "Latin Rite of the ROMAN Catholic Church" as Latin and Roman are equivalent verbiage? Its no big deal but it does seem a bit awkward, IMO. Micael (talk) 21:50, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dean of boking

[edit]

It is Dean of boking or Dean of booking ??? Thanks a lot Guilhem06 15:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boking. It's nowadays in Essex, but I think it was part of the historical East Anglia. TCC (talk) (contribs) 23:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vicariate and Deanery

[edit]

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Erie has three Vicariates -- East, North, and West Vicariate. Map of Erie Diocese And each vicariate has several deaneries. See Deanery. This level of administration below a diocese is seen today in at least three dioceses in the US, probably more. In Wikipedia, Vicariate redirects to Vicar, so I added a disambiguation note at Vicar recommending that those looking for Vicariate may also wish to look at Deanery. It explains in some detail the Canon that allows a vicariate to be formed. Deanery contains a link to Vicar Forane, but that link redirects to Archpriest, which says the position is arcane except in Rome and a few other sites. Someone who knows more about the Roman Catholic church may wish to revamp Wikipedia's assessment of vicariates and include at least a mention of them under diocese and parish. Pat 05:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Protopope

[edit]

The Wikipedia article Protopope contains much useful information that is relevant here--though its inclusion would considerably lengthen this article. If it is deemed best not to merge the two, a prominent link from this article to taht one should IMHO be placed in this article. Any opinions? MishaPan (talk) 18:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A merger isn't really appropriate, as the articles are about different subjects. A link in the see also section would be appropriate. Dgf32 (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]