Talk:Architecture of Leeds/GA2
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello! I'll be reviewing Architecture of Leeds (the article, not the actual architecture), in line with the Good Article criteria. I see there has been a previous review, and I shall be using the comments made there in this review. Good luck! - weebiloobil (talk) 16:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
A comparison of the changes made since the last review
Oh dear
Plus points
[edit]- All but one of the pictures are properly licensced
- Passes WP:LAYOUT
- Passes WP:JARGON
- The article is broad, yet focused
- The article is stable
Urgent!
[edit]- The fair use rationale for File:Quarry Hill Flats1.jpg appears to be malformed.
Bad bits
[edit]This is not a definitive list
- Spelling and grammar: "While the first church in Leeds is thought to have been built around 600 AD.[2]"
- Fails WP:LEAD: see WP:BOLDTITLE for why
- Fails WP:AVOID: "It is generally regarded as one of the best examples of Norman churches in Yorkshire.[4]" by who? generally? one of the best? too unspecific
- Fails WP:VERIFY: "Headingley[7] and Wetherby[8][9] both had castles dating from this era, however there are no notable visible remains of either of the structures. Headingley Castle was redeveloped into a Tudar-Gothic Villa of the same name.[7]" - source 7 is a photo of a hotel, with the castle glimpsed in the b/g. Where is the source for this info?
- Fails WP:NPOV: the best example being "Leeds now has some of the best high rise architecture outside of London, in particular Bridgewater Place. "
The above includes only one example for each of the failed criterion; if you need any explanation, or more examples, feel free to contact me.
Unfortunately, I feel that I have to fail the article, based on the information provided above. Feel free to relist the article at WP:GAN when you feel it is ready. Thanks - weebiloobil (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Editors Notes
Point 1: Looked over, needs more attention
Point 2: Sorted
Point 3: To look over
Point 4: To look over
Point 5: Sored
Licence Malformation
[edit]The licence for Quarry Hill is replicated three times to provide it with sufficient justification for fair use on each page. If anyone knows a better way, please tell me. Mtaylor848 (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)