Jump to content

Talk:Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

History section seems too oriented to the Nicaraguan point of view as it only speaks on the history of the conflict omiting parts of the Colombian POV.
— Carlos Th (talk) 15:31, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article is fair. Lets wait for the Hague to resolve the dispute between the two countries. - Gabriel Solorzano
I've now added the English puritan settlers point-of-view! :-) Carcharoth 16:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A INFOBOX DIFFERENCES A

[edit]

I don't see any problem by using the country infobox, it just provides more material, since the department infobox looks a little "creepy", using the country infobox will also tel about the present situation in which the lands are disputed. I think it doesn't matter however.

201.218.69.252 21:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

San Andres is not a country! If you don't like the infobox design one yourself and then propose it at WP:COL. In case of approval you will also have to change the infoboxes in the other 31 departments of Colombia articles to keep the standard. --F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 05:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'll see what do I do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.218.69.252 (talk) 21:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New article in NY Times

[edit]

Might be good for writing about the current political situation as well as the conflicting claims of Nicaragua and Columbia. See: here. --Bobak (talk) 15:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Good history and geo sections, adding in econ and some cleanup would get this well on way to completion. Hwonder talk contribs 01:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 01:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 08:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alburquerque, Albuquerque

[edit]

It's Cayo Alburquerque on Google Maps.

It's mostly Albuquerque on Google.

Both are used in this article.

Seems to be the same place.

MBG02 (talk) 23:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting WP:TE from likely WP:SPA and WP:SOCK

[edit]

I have reverted the insertion of WP:UNDUE, WP:BIAS and WP:TE by blocked IP user as likely WP:SPA. Similar changes were made by this user to several related pages: Afro-Caribbeans, Afro-Jamaicans, Bermuda, Black Bermudians, Cayman Islands, Coromantee, Jamaican Creole, Jamaican Maroon Creole, Mixed-race Caymanians, Tacky's Rebellion, Turks and Caicos Creole, Turks & Caicos, and many others.

Having compared the diffs to see if there was anything worth keeping, I have manually restored anything with RSes or which improved prose (if there was anything). Most changes were poorly sourced and added significant bias into the article, or simply removed existing information for no policy-based reason.

For transparency, I will post this on all affected pages. Lewisguile (talk) 18:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Archipelago_of_San_Andrés,_Providencia_and_Santa_Catalina&oldid=1246398527"