Talk:Archbishop Tenison's Church of England High School, Croydon

Schools Mid‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scholls Assessment

Need some references! Pictures would be good. Alumni required to justify importance with refs. Welcome. Victuallers 14:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Co-ed

"... Tenison's is one of the oldest surviving co-educational establishments in the country. It is a little known fact that Tenison's is the longest surviving mixed gender school in the world."

If it's the longest surviving mixed gender school in the world, "one of the oldest surviving co-educational establishments in the country" is too modest! I can't remember whether they told us this factoid when I was there - if I could, I'd have edited the text. [Anon. Old Tenisonian] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.72.145 (talk) 15:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title?

Does the title of this article not need to be the full name, i.e. "Church of England," rather than "C of E?"Jessicapierce 22:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

its up to you, but it can be a lot of workto changeVictuallers 14:17, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tenisonsshield2.JPG

Image:Tenisonsshield2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 09:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sports

There are several "citation needed" requests on the sports section that have been unanswered since April. I have searched the school website and prospectus and can find very little about sports at the school. That it does sports and wins occasionally does not seem to be notable. I was tempted to delete the whole section but I don't want to remove information that is probably correct and may be more notable than is apparent. If anyone can find some sources that describe the school's sporting ethos or achievements and can paste up a source, I would be happy to rewrite the section to match what is verifiable. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 12:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Date of foundation

All external sources I found have the fate of foundation as 1714, but the school website says 1685. Does anyone know why there is a discrepancy? The external sources are better so we should stick with 1714 unless there is a source for 1685. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]