Talk:Archaeology of shipwrecks

Archaeology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwrecks High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Underwater diving Mid‑importance

	Underwater diving portal This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Underwater divingWikipedia:WikiProject Underwater divingTemplate:WikiProject Underwater divingUnderwater diving articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 June 2020 and 3 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Krw77. Peer reviewers: Laurela2020.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Archaeology of shipwrecks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Large Quotes

There are two large paragraphs in the lead that are entire quotes from one source. Should these be broken down, deleted, or moved to another section? -Mrman0930 (talk) 02:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrman0930: Move to another section. The lead should be a summary of the article, so a brief summary of the content of the quotes can stay in the lead. --RexxS (talk) 11:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List(s)

Pls see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lists_of_shipwrecks#Findings_and_raisings. 41.58.236.133 (talk) 19:43, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stick to the subject

If this article is about the archaeology of shipwrecks, then it should focus on wrecks that have been archaeologically investigated. The section "Examples of famous shipwrecks" should not have a home here. What, exactly, is the archaeological importance of the Titanic when compared with other wrecks? However important it might be to mention sites where recreational divers can visit, this also is of minor importance to the article. Nor does the existence of a television program about a wreck necessarily make it worthy of mention in the article. What is needed is some focus on archaeologically important shipwrecks, with an explanation of what is important about each of them.

A non-exhaustive list of wrecks of particular importance would probably be made up of the following:

European and Mediterranean origins

Bronze age

Classical period/Iron age

Medieval

Sutton Hoo ship (OK, not a wreck, but it is archeologically important)
Yassi Ada 7th century shipwreck
Skuldelev ships (a.k.a. Roskilde)
Bremen cog
Newport medieval ship

Early modern

This list is clearly incomplete, but I think it makes the point. Wrecks of vessels built outside the European and Mediterranean area need to be added, as well as from more recent periods. Titanic, for the avoidance of doubt, adds little to archaeological knowledge when compared with those listed above. The article therefore needs some fairly radical surgery. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 20:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]