Talk:Arch of Dignity, Equality, and Justice

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 May 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

California: State University Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by California State University task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Logo image

This image of the logo, which had been added and then removed, seems a good addition to the page. Maybe placing it, centered, before the reference section, works as a focus and gallery. Although it is duplicated in the smaller infobox photo the logo is a central feature of the artwork. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "logo" is already visable in the infobox image, which also shows the rest of the arch. The article is not large enough for a gallery or even a second image, especially one that is superfluous. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 14:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and I disagree. Many artwork articles have images which focus on a part of the artwork, and the close-up of the logo's placement, linked above, works well. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]