Talk:Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura/GA2
Appearance
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Use of questionable and self-published sources
[edit]The article references many questionable and self-published sources. Reviews from GameFAQs users, MobyGames users, and self-published pages like metzomagic.com should not be used. Mimir (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed - I recommend an immediate delist. I have no idea how this ever could have passed. --Teancum (talk) 12:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delist - I do not believe this article was scrutinised closely enough when it became GA.--The Taerkasten (talk) 12:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Delisted due to the lack of additional comments and the concerns given above, which I can also verify. It can be re-nominated for GA if these issues are addressed. Re-assessing as C-Class. –MuZemike 01:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)