Talk:Funeral (Arcade Fire album)

Canada: Music Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Alternative music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen ^Talk 20:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination unclarity

The statement: "Funeral was also nominated for a Grammy Award in 2005 for Best Alternative Music Album," is unclear. This is because it was nominated in 2005 but it does not make clear that it was for the 2006 grammys. That is unless it was nominated in both 2005 and 2006, because it was definately nominated for a grammy in the awards given out in 2006. A side statement I would like to make is that this album technically does not even qualify for the 2006 grammys because of the fact it was released in September of 2004 making it elegible for the 2005 grammys. However the recording Academy still nominated it for an best alternative album of 2005 in 2005 for an award ceremony held in 2006.

Do you have a source for the Grammy 2006 nom? --217.235.235.220

February 2005

The album was released in 2004. The inlay cafd says "Funeral 28 February 2005". Does anyone know what does it mean? If it's a re-release date, then what do the other editions say? --Amir E. Aharoni 13:58, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

I like the fact that the current introduction is more about the album than about its reception. However, this should be done with care to avoid POV. I'm still not happy with it as it is, so please improve! --217.235.235.220

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was The article and talk page were moved and page histories merged. —Centrx→talk • 03:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Funeral (Arcade Fire album) → Funeral (album) … Rationale: creation of dab page after artist failed AFD[1]
Talk:Arcade Fire - Funeral → Talk:Funeral (album) Rationale: same, move back to join its page}} … Please share your opinion at Talk:Arcade Fire - Funeral. —Dhartung | Talk 22:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support. Procedure wasn't followed, article/talk page broken, dab page unneeded for two albums of unequal notability. --Dhartung | Talk 23:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, only album with the name. Crumbsucker 02:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move to funeral (album). I did not protect it from page moves, since it is only one user, not a high-profile page and has only been moved twice. I suppose it could be protected if it is moved again, but I suggest blocking the user for a week instead. Also, if it is moved again, just explain and request a speedy move on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. -- Kjkolb 08:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Funeral (Arcade Fire) → Funeral (album) – DAB page was created again (second time in two weeks by same person) for a non-notable musician. Should probably be speedy moved. Crumbsucker 15:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support Speedy Move. DoubleBlue (Talk) 04:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support and I will ask for move protection. The editor has been warned against repeating this behavior. --Dhartung | Talk 06:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Song Title Correction

I request the song title "Haiti" be changed to "Haïti" which is what I believe to be the correct spelling, as seen in the booklet and lyrics to the song. Thank You. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.130.71.239 (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ArcadeFireFuneralCover.jpg

Image:ArcadeFireFuneralCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of vague information in Chuck quote

I wrote in the popular culture section that the album runs for "approximately 48 minutes". I realize that more specific information is available. In the album info box, the length of Funeral is given as 48:12; I have no reason to doubt that this is true, at least for the official CD release. The downloadable version of the album from eMusic, though, lists the total length of the album as 47:56. In either case, Chuck is incorrect by about six minutes. 68.63.63.122 02:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Funeral (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091002023347/http://www.stylusmagazine.com/review.php?ID=2329 to http://stylusmagazine.com/review.php?ID=2329

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Funeral (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140926074604/http://choral-history-funeral.dumdum.fr/ to http://choral-history-funeral.dumdum.fr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]