Talk:Arbetarhistoria
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arbetarhistoria article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Peer reviewed?
[edit]Is this periodical peer reviewed? If not, it should better be treated as a magazine. --Randykitty (talk) 12:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps that is correct. The journal is not peer-reviewed, but all texts are written by academics at Scandinavian universities or archival institution. P. S. Burton (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying that, so it's basically something like Scientific American, a magazine written by academics for a mixed public, but not an academic journal. I'll change the article accordingly. --Randykitty (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)