Talk:Arapaima

References and photos

- - - The Pirarucu is a fantastic fish, but THIS PAGE NEEDS REFERENCES! Sorry, but I don't know where or how else to post this, and I can't edit the actual article for some reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.210.69.29 (talk) 22:43, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone runs into free licensed pictures of this please add :O I just thought it'd be cool after reading http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8404622/ where it was described as dinosaur like. gren 30 June 2005 15:41 (UTC)

I couldn't find an image, so I took this one. Sorry it's so dark; I'll try to get a better one. Ginkgo100 00:10, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Size

The length of 4.5 metres is greatly exaggerated. The largest reliably measured Arapaima was 2.63 m (8 ft. 7½ in.) long, weighed 185 kg (407 lb.), and had a girth of 165 cm (65 in.). It was caught by British angler Joe Taylor in Bung Sam Lan Lake, Thailand, on August 26, 2001 (interestingly within its introduced distribution). A picture with details can be found on FishBase Arapaima picture page, though, ironically, FishBase recognizes the 4.5 m maximum length on its Arapaima species summary page.

And for some reason Guinness World Records has recognized this figure in recent editions. However, previously they listed the largest confirmed specimen at 2.48 m (8 ft. 1½ in.) length, and 147 kg (325 lb.) weight, caught in the Rio Negro river, Brazil, in 1836.

Now, if a 4.5 m (14 ft. 9 in.) long Arapaima had similar proportions as the two measured individuals, it should weigh c. 900 kg (2,000 lb.) – not 200 kg (440 lb.). In fact, with the proportions of a typical European Eel, a fish this long would weigh c. 170–200 kg (370–440 lb.). Needles to say, the proportions of the claimed size are just impossible for an Arapaima. Strange, that claims this absurd get recognized by such authorities.

And thus, the Arapaima is also shorter than Giant Mekong Catfish. Wels Catfish (Silurus glanis, 256.7 kg/566 lb.), Yellowtail Catfish (Pangasius pangasius, 208 kg/460 lb.), Giant Pangasius (Pangasius sanitwongsei, 200 kg/441 lb.), and Nile Perch (Lates niloticus, 188.6 kg/416 lb.) have also reached greater weights than Arapaima. But it is the largest freshwater fish species in South America.

The Wels Catfish, mentioned above, should be the longest freshwater fish. The 256.7 kg specimen, caught in Desna river, Russia (now Ukraine) in 1918, measured 3.35 m (11 ft.) long, and there's a report of a 3.6 m (12 ft. 9½ in.), 180 kg (397 lb.) individual from Sweden in 1871 (I'm unsure if this is still recognized by Swedish authorities). And there are unconfirmed reports of similar length as the largest Arapaima claim, and even longer. A shame there's no Wikipedia article for this species...

The fish on the picture is in fact no catfish at all, but a Huso huso, a very large sturgeon which was once common in the river Danubia. If you take a closer look to this fish, and compare it with both Huso and wels, you see that this is undoubtless no wels. Cause of the bad qualitiy and the very bad perspective, the pointed snout of the short-nosed huso is nearly not visible. Because this species of sturgeon is a very active hunter of other fish, it has a very large and wide mouth, what lead to the false interpretation that it were a wels. I have even found a picture from a internet-site about caviar, which showed a new photo of a huso in blach and white, and in nearly the same position, and it looks nearly identical to the fish on the picture. The body of the wels has another shape, and they have also large barbels on their snouts, which this fish has not. Therefore you can see the short and small barbels husos have under their snouts. The actual record catfish was caught some years ago in Italy, it was an enormous fish of 2,78m and a weight of 144kg, much bigger than any other wels whose existence was proven. The false maximum size of the Arampaima has its origin in the beginning of the 20th century. The Indians were asked by the german Biologist Hans Schomburg how large this fish grow, and they said it could reach 200kg and 4,5m. This dates were copied by thousands of authors, and nearly none of them has ever made own research, or any calculations about size-weight-relations. In fact there was never any known specimen from South America which came only close to this size, only the arampaimas which grew up in fishing-ponds in Thailand, managed to reach a size close to only 3m.

Thank you for this correction. I never actually paid that much attention to that picture. And though I'm no fish expert, these are two very different species, and I certainly would have noticed this in a color photo. The weight of 144 kg (317 lb) is certainly more plausable as a record, than 256 kg, considering the fact that nowadays individuals more than 2.5 m (8 ft 2½ in) in length and 100 kg (220 lb) are very rare. Indeed, I later noticed that the old Swedish record is way out of proportion as well; and after collecting information on seemingly reliable large Wels individuals there was a huge gap between the 256 and the 144 kg individuals, with no records in between.

With this cleared up, the question is: what now is the longest freshwater fish? There is a record from 1993 of a 3 m (9 ft 10 in) 242 kg (533 lb) Giant Mekong Catfish, but I've read that the length may not be accurate – though this species is firmly the heaviest with the 293 kg (646 lb) 2.7 m (8 ft 10½ in) individual caught in 2005. The Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) is another possible candidate with a 2.96 m (9 ft 8½ in) 137 kg (302 lb) specimen from 1953.

Arapaima's average length has been recently reported at 1.3 m (4¼ ft.), and another source gave the mean weight at 20 kg (44 lb.). And since Arapaimas reach sexual maturity at 1.5 m (5 ft.), most of the Arapaimas today are immature. Consequence of overfishing no doubt.

The longest fish which swim in freshwater are beluga sturgeons(Huso huso) which can reach in expetional cases a length of more than 5m. But they normally live in the sea and come only in the freshwater to spawn. Large sawfish, which can grow longer than 5m, also sometimes swim up in the rivers of Australia. The longest fish which live in freshwater for their whole live, are giant freshwater stingrays. They have a very long whip-like tail, and can reach lengths of more than 4m.

Fish sizes

There should probably be a separate article Largest freshwater fish that addresses all these claims, so that all the candidate species articles can link to it instead of trying to reproduce the verbiage each in slightly different and possibly incorrect ways. Article is likely to be of general interest, fisherfolk always being fascinated by fish size. Stan 06:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. We could then make reference to the new article in regard to these claims. This has been thrown about before but nobody has gotten around to doing it. Volunteers? --Ginkgo 100 ^talk 17:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Largest organisms article cover these claims, though currently missing a proper amount of citations. MiltonT 02:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

there big as a normal persons peter — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.77.175.131 (talk) 19:14, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Air-breathing

The Arapaima are renowned and famous for being able to breathe air from the surface due to a lung-like lining to their throat. I don't feel the article makes this sufficiently clear, so I am planning to add it in. Liamshaw 16:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC) The capillaries in the bladder of the fish is the structure that is responsible for this fish's ability to breathe air. Source: http://www.whozoo.org/Intro98/paomora/pirarucu2.htm --Wdydfft (talk) 23:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the beluga sturgeon is not considered to be a truly fresh water fish because it spends a large part of its lifecycle in brackish or salt water. Secondly the sturgeons do not have a truly bony skeleton and as such are also ineledgible for consideration as the heaviest bony fish known. 212.159.21.158 13:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The term "bony fish" refers to the taxonomic group Osteichthyes distinct from the group Chondrichthyes. The latter group is more primitive and contains sharks and rays. Sturgeon are part of the former group, although they appear to have evolved in a way that reduced the amount of bone in their skeletons. (Fossilized ancestors of sturgeon had more bone than modern sturgeon do.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.106.183.194 (talk) 17:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

10 feet 1 inch, 339 pound source

This video source shows the catch and release of a 10 foot 1 inch 339 lb individual. It's a primary source but should be sufficient for putting stats at a verified largest catch. — raeky t 18:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suckling young - Durrell citation

The article says "In his book The Whispering Land, naturalist Gerald Durrell reports hearing the tale in Argentina that female arapaima have been seen secreting a white substance from a gland in the head and that their young have been noted seemingly feeding on the substance."

I don't have "The Whispering Land" to hand, but I'm currently reading Durrell's "Three Singles to Adventure" (Penguin paperback, ISBN 0140020829, 1975 printing) which has the following paragraph in chapter 4, on page 89:

McTurk told us a curious thing about these fish, which has not, so far as I can find out, been recorded before. During the breeding season the female arapaima develops a form of gland on the back of the head, which exudes a white, milk-like substance. He said that on several occasions he had observed young arapaima clustering round their mother's head and apparently feeding on this white 'milk'. This astonished me, and I hoped that we might be lucky enough to see such a sight during our stay in the Rupununi, but unfortunately we did not. The discovery of a fish that 'suckles' its young would, I feel, cause no little sensation among zoologists and ichthyologists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.142.96.34 (talk) 14:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arapaima taxonomy

This page is a bit of a mess and it is entirely unclear if it is supposed to be about a single species (see e.g. taxobox) or about several species (see e.g. inclusion of photos of several species). In the former case, much of the info should be updated to reflect whichever species it is supposed to be about. In the latter case, the article should be merged with Arapaima (genus), while splitting off info specific to single species to their own articles.
One problem is that FishBase, the de-facto taxonomic authority on wiki, have followed Stewart (and Castello) in most of the taxonomy they proposed, but for some reason continue to treat Arapaima arapaima as a synonym of Arapaima gigas. Why they've done this is unclear; it is not supported by recent taxonomic publications. It is entirely possible that they only had these well-known names, A. arapaima and A. gigas, listed before and then simply forgot to update the taxonomy when the new publication resurrected several previous synonyms, but who knows (it has happened before – see e.g. Andinoacara and flagtail pipefish; both later corrected by FishBase). A rough taxonomic overview can be seen in the current version of Arapaima (genus). 62.107.220.107 (talk) 17:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think most of the information in this article applies to the entire genus, especially since since little distinction has been made until recently between the different species. I support merging this article into Arapaima (genus) and creating new articles or stubs for A. gigas and/or A. arapaima if there is enough specific information (pun intended). 67.188.230.128 (talk) 02:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arapaima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141222053118/http://www.petproductnews.com/web-exclusives/arapaima-re-classification-and-the-trade.aspx to http://www.petproductnews.com/web-exclusives/arapaima-re-classification-and-the-trade.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Second Life

Arapaima is the name of a popular locale in the virtual world Second Life — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5CC:C580:3D50:BD4F:EF7A:D969:1D27 (talk) 06:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]