Talk:Arabic Wikipedia

Wikipedia High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

This article was nominated for deletion on February 18, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Grammar changes

Changing "team are" to "team is" is actually a MOS:ENGVAR change... AnonMoos (talk) 09:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of the Sarah Hegazi article

The article on Sarah Hegazi was deleted. According to reliable sources BBC Arabic and Raseef22, this has caused some controversy. There is a paragraph on the deletion and controversy in the Evaluation and criticism section. Please discuss possible changes to coverage of the event here. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic Wikipedia Page

Hi,

Whom do I need to coordinate with to put in an Arabic Wikipedia Page? Requesting your assistance, please.

Thank you, Dsouza Josh (talk) 10:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Dsouza_Josh[reply]

If you have relevant Arabic-language skills, and have useful information to contribute in a way that respects the rules, then you don't have to ask anyone's permission -- you can start editing right away. If you lack those prerequisites, it would probably be better not to get directly involved, though there's an "Embassy" page for non-Arabic speakers. AnonMoos (talk) 19:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blackout

Arabic Wikipedia just announced a blackout in support of Palestine, so I wonder why that's not mentioned in the article yet Gattor1 (talk) 17:14, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality lost?

Isn't the changing of the colors of the wikipedia symbol to the colors of the Palestinian flag violates Wikipedia's professed principals of Neutrality? Hebrew Wikipedia's symbol isn't colored Blue-White... 89.208.62.122 (talk) 10:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to raise a formal complaint, you'd have to do so somewhere on Meta.Wikimedia.org, not here. Anyway, they were the colors of the 1917 Flag of the Arab Revolt before Palestine, and are known as Pan-Arab colors... AnonMoos (talk) 14:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but you didn't answer their question 78.147.35.211 (talk) 04:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Those colors are pan-Arab. But the text they added in the main page clearly states that Arabic Wikipedia stands in solidarity with Palestine. A formal complaint? Much good that would do. I am a regular Wikipedia donor because I believe in Wikipedia's mission statement. It's sad to see those core principals erode."

"Basically the Arab version of the English "pseudoscience effort"

Pls do mention this too out there too"

Two comments made by me and earlier,someone else (the other guy's, atleast was pretty much on-topic, on-discussion) were reverted as SOAPBOXing for grounds that are pretty much only criticising enwiki or wiki in general when there is certainly stuff to criticize even on enwiki 2402:E280:3D1D:5B0:A931:9CB8:4420:455 (talk) 08:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can say so, but they whitewashed Hamas's crimes there so maybe place this concern to all

https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13169 CD967119 (talk) 00:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, if this is true: [1] there's definitely a violation there. AnonMoos (talk) 23:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, The arabic wikipedia is very biased, I don't know how can this be allowed on wikipedia. Yehonatan19 (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]