Talk:Aquila A 211

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

New type or variant

Seems to me the 211 is just this year's model of the 210, a variant and not a new type. Could have covered it in a line or two in the A 210 article.TSRL (talk) 10:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It probably could have. I wrote a quick article to match the photo with the manufacturer not even mentioning the A210 on thier website. When I found the A210, I was about to toss out the article until I saw how different the performance numbers were between the two versions. FlugKerl (talk) 13:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aquila A 211. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201214411/http://www.airventure.org/news/2013/130730_aquila-debuts-in-US.html to http://www.airventure.org/news/2013/130730_aquila-debuts-in-US.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]