Jump to content

Talk:Aquatica (water parks)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

i would like to see some pictures of cabanas at aquatica — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.190.21 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 29 June 2008‎

Merge?

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge.

I don't mind either way on this but how would everyone else feel if the Aquatica Florida and Aquatica San Antonio articles were merged to form an article similar to Six Flags Hurricane Harbor, Knott's Soak City etc. This would also allow information about the new Aquatica San Diego to be included as well. Themeparkgc  Talk  01:12, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support as long as it would look like the Knott's Soak City because the contents box is clearer and the article has less subtitles. ihafez talk01:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was just about to create the Aquatica San Diego and I saw this. I think it would be a good idea.--Astros4477 (talk) 01:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a draft article structure at User:Themeparkgc/Sandboxes/Aquatica. Feel free to contribute. All contribution history will be preserved when moving to the main article space. Themeparkgc  Talk  02:16, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What does everyone else think of the draft article in its current state? I think it is pretty much ready for publication. Themeparkgc  Talk  01:18, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think it looks pretty good. Maybe a little more information in the San Diego section of what it will have?--Astros4477 (talk) 02:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good job, we just need to copy the ride info from Aquatica San Diego's attractions. ihafez talk 17:16, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well I don't think any of the attractions for the San Diego park have been announced yet. The listing currently on the Soak City page is likely to change before the park reopens as Aquatica. Themeparkgc  Talk  01:28, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus, and no prejudice against a new request. Now that this article has existed for a while, we should have a whole month of data to examine for January, though this RM may have skewed relevant page views. --BDD (talk) 17:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

– I believe the article on the water parks is the primary topic. A Google News search reveals approximately 18–29x more results for the US water park chain when compared to Aquatica Kolkata and Psathyrella aquatica, respectively. The last article on the DAB page, Aquatica KK, is only briefly mentioned in the The Green Connection article. That article was redirected many years ago, presumably after notability concerns. A hatnote could be added on Aquatica (water parks) to point to the disambiguation page. Relisted. BDD (talk) 19:48, 27 December 2012 (UTC) Themeparkgc  Talk  01:31, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - as this article was the merger of Aquatica Florida and Aquatica San Antonio you could pull up the page view stats of both articles as well as Aquatica San Diego which was just a redirect at the time. Statistics over the past 30 days:
  • The three Aquatica parks discussed in this article: 1175, 965, and 630 views, respectively (total: 2770)
  • Aquatica (Kolkata): 754
  • Aquatica KK (The Green Connection): 257
  • Psathyrella aquatica: 313
  • The disambiguation page itself: 324
Themeparkgc  Talk  22:00, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There's a tonne more species than that (All pages with titles containing aquatica) -- 65.92.180.225 (talk) 05:21, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I never knew that. I wonder why one species was included on the DAB and the others weren't. Themeparkgc  Talk  22:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Judging by the page view stats for the articles actually called "Aquatica", this appears to be more prominent than all the other options combined. I don't believe thespecies should be on the list unless they are commonly called just "aquatica", per MOS:DAB.--Cúchullain t/c 16:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The fact that the articles were merged does not mean that you can count all of the page hits as ones for the company. In fact they could be used to make the case that an article for each park could be justified. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Even if an article for each park is justified, the primary topic of the title would still be the family of parks. bd2412 T 16:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aquatica (water parks). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aquatica (water parks). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Aquatica_(water_parks)&oldid=1195611581"