Talk:Aquafaba

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Scientific Consensus

How does Aquafaba mimic egg whites so well? The first line of the article says "because of its function as an emulsifier, leavening agent, and foaming agent." But later, the says that there's no scientific consensus. That's a really simple and satisfying scientific explanation to me, so what exactly is missing from the consensus? Does that statement just mean that we don't have a series of studies proving a scientific law stating that Aquafaba is chemically similar to egg whites? Or is it complete bullshit? Daniel J. Hakimi (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How much fiber does this have? It looks to me like the gelling is a product ofwater soluble fiber. this idea of emusifier is odd, unless fiber is an emulsifier....? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jawnn (talk • contribs) 18:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Aquafaba. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.revolutionvegetale.com/en/non-classe/la-mousse-vegetale/
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.revolutionvegetale.com/fr/non-classe/mousses-isolats-de-proteines/
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.revolutionvegetale.com/fr/non-classe/mousses-mucilages/
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.revolutionvegetale.com/non-classe/ile-flottante-de-chaville-2/
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.revolutionvegetale.com/fr/non-classe/mousse-au-chocolat/
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.revolutionvegetale.com/non-classe/meringue-de-chaville/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Egg Replacement Uses

The duplex sentence about the Aqua-stuff used in Egg Replacements Application as substitutes for dairy, cheese (also dairy?) and meat should be better explained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.224.2 (talk) 01:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 32 is broken

The article "Aquafaba, what is its chemical composition?" is not there. -PelicanTwo (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aquafaba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160528021706/http://www.dieteticai.ufba.br/temas/metodosdecoccao/microondas.pdf to http://www.dieteticai.ufba.br/Temas/metodosdecoccao/microondas.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford English Dictionary

The online edition of the OED does not contain an entry for aquafaba, nor for faba. And the entry for aqua lists some compounds, but not this one. I think the reference needs to be deleted. ABehrens (talk) 20:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salt in canned chickpeas liquid

The image suggests using the liquid from the can when the pre-cooked chickpeas are drained, while the article is largely about re-use of cooking liquid when using dried chickpeas. In some cases (8 out of 10 in one study[1]), the liquid from cans will be extremely high in salt, which may affect its potential use directly, as well as the results of foaming aquafaba. Is it worth mentioning this? 2A00:23C6:148A:9B01:5CC2:3A4:6DEB:972 (talk) 11:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]