Talk:Approximation property (ring theory)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Approximation property (ring theory) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 16 February 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Artin approximation property?
[edit]Another possible name. Not sure how common it is, but might be a better title than having parentheses. Lithopsian (talk) 17:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- Or/and consider turning plain old approximation property into a disambiguation page. Would probably be a good idea anyway since there are two things with the same name, only distinguished by parentheses, but if the existing one is by far the most commonly referred-to then it could stay and the disambiguation page would be something like Approximation property (disambiguation). Lithopsian (talk) 17:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- It’s a good term except no one uses it (so, unfortunately, we can’t use it here). “approximation property” in functional analysis is much more common, so creating the disambig page is probably unnecessary (we have the hatnote with a link to this page in approximation property.) —- Taku (talk) 18:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)