Talk:Apples and Bananas
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Additional citations
[edit]Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 06:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Based on the tags at the top of the article, the concern seems to be based on notability. No topic should have an article on Wikipedia unless it is notability. Notability is demonstrated by citing reliable sources that directly and substantially discuss the subject of the article. As this article has no references at all, there is currently no evidence of notability. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- It seems like the notability tag covers it then, and the citation tag may be removed. Hyacinth (talk) 00:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Apples and Bananas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140302183209/http://www.reading.org/Libraries/Inspire/Teaching_Reading.pdf to http://www.reading.org/Libraries/Inspire/Teaching_Reading.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)