Talk:Appenninica

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Agriculture: Livestock Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Livestock task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Xoloz (talk) 00:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Appenninica (sheep) → Appenninica – No need for disambiguation. Appenninica redirects to Apennine Mountains, but there is no reason for it to do so, since Appenninica is not a word in English, and even if you constructed one (e.g. as complement to "Appalachia" and similar words), it would be Apenninica, with only one p, because of how we spell "Apennine". The WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Appenninica" in English is unquestionably this sheep breed; virtually no one ever is going to type that character string in a search box here looking for the mountains. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ⚞(^Ʌⱷ҅̆_⚲͜ⱷ^{^})≼ 17:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Sounds fine to me. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:UNDAB (Yes, it's an essay, heavily edited by Yours Truly, but it reflects policy-based reasoning that applies here). --B2C 20:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC) added essay clarification. --B2C 05:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that WP:UNDAB redirects to Wikipedia:Unnecessary disambiguation, which is neither a policy nor a guideline. It is an essay largely written by B2C. There is nothing wrong with editors creating an essay which explains their views, provided that they disclose the document's status and their own role in creating it. B2C's failure to mention his own authorship misleads others. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:28, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superfluous disambiguation. ^walk victor falk^talk 00:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.