Talk:Appalachian mixed mesophytic forests

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ecoregions Mid‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Ecoregions, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of ecoregions. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on these topics. See WikiProject Ecoregions and Wikipedia:FAQ/Contributing.EcoregionsWikipedia:WikiProject EcoregionsTemplate:WikiProject EcoregionsEcoregions articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page has many issues

I know people don't really read the talk pages on articles this obscure and non-controversial. But I thought I'd share my thoughts about this so that maybe someone will come along (years from now...) and help me figure out a solution.

The problem is that these WWF ecoregions aren't really that notable. I don't know any scientist in the field who uses them. My colleagues in the southeastern United States use the EPA ecoregioins, or we just talk about physiographic provinces. What we need is a great article on the Appalachian Plateaus, not this. I'm not even sure what this region is supposed to be. The WWF website (used as a source) says this ecoregion extends into western North Carolina, which of course is the heart of the Appalachian-Blue Ridge forests. No practicing ecologist that I'm aware of would muddle these two together.

So due to this confusion, we have spill-overs from the Appalachian-Blue Ridge forests on this page, such as mentions of spruce-fir forest. I don't want to spend much effort on this article, because I think its flawed from its very name and premise. The ecoregion of the Appalachian Plateau is notable, and deserve their own page. But that page shouldn't be defined by the non-notable WWF conception of this region.Masebrock (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Appalachian mixed mesophytic forests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130404002733/http://www.nature.org/ourscience/sciencefeatures/conservation-atlas-1.xml to http://www.nature.org/ourscience/sciencefeatures/conservation-atlas-1.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed

Perhaps one of the issues referenced by Masebrock is that this article does not tell us what is meant by "MIXED" mesophytic. It probably should also define the word "mesophytic" rather than just link to another article. After all if its an important enough term to be used in the title, you shouldn't have to turn elsewhere to determine what it means.TwelveGreat (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]