Talk:Apostille

Hi, I wanted to hear a more complete explanation for why the apostille link and information was deleted.

The link was http://www.nuwireinvestor.com/article.aspx?id=10 and I added a small quote from that article:

"Investors can often avoid the process of getting an apostille by completing power of attorney paperwork while in the country in which the deal will take place. Even in that case, however, it might be necessary to obtain an apostille in the future. Those who purchase property through a U.S. entity, such as a Limited Liability Company (LLC) or Corporation, will typically need to get an apostille for the entity documents. In countries that allow ownership by U.S. entities, this will enable the entity to sign purchase documents and take title. The process of getting an apostille usually takes a couple of weeks at minimum, so investors should plan accordingly."

I read the information about adding external links, and believed that I was expanding an article stub. The article was free of charge, with no ads on it, and particularly, and didn't violate any of the terms of Wikipedia, and in fact *expanded* the article because it was a stub, which is what your site was seeking, correct? So what exactly caused you to delete the link or the extra info?? JadeEJF 16:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)JadeEJF[reply]

See Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promoting a publication. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Wikipedia is not for advertising, and this article is no exception. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

whats that "The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia" in the end of the article?--82.146.27.71 00:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:02, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]