Talk:Aoshima Subtropical Botanical Garden

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 22:04, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Comment

On March 4, 2015, user Safiel proposed this article for deletion. I have removed that tag, as suggested by the following text in the proposed deletion notice: "You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the proposed deletion/dated notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page." Safiel's stated reason was as follows: "unsourced x 8 years, sentence could easily be mentioned at Aoshima, Miyazaki or Miyazaki Prefecture."

I disagree with this approach in two ways. First, the article has been sourced all this time; please see its External Links (2 items) which provide information used in the article. Thus it certainly has been sourced. Second, I do not see that any of the "Reasons for deletion" in Wikipedia deletion policy have been met in this proposed deletion, and hence do not understand why the deletion should occur.

Of course I will be very happy to discuss this, and even happier if we find a way to improve the article rather than delete it.

with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 01:17, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note I placed the PROD tag on behalf of another user that had placed an incorrectly formatted PROD tag. Safiel (talk) 01:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]