Talk:Antonius van den Broek

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Biographies Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Nuclear charge yes, number of protons doubtful in 1911

"the first who realized that the number of an element in the periodic table corresponds to its total number of electrons and protons and therefore the charge of the atom nucleus." Certainly he was the first to equate atomic number to nuclear charge, but I question whether in 1911 he equated nuclear charge to number of electrons and protons.

Remember that this was in 1911, twenty years before the neutron was proposed and then discovered. Prior to about 1930 as explained in Neutron#Discovery, the nucleus was believed to consist of protons and ELECTRONS. In the 1920's N-14 (for example) supposedly had 14 protons (to explain the mass without proposing neutrons), 7 "nuclear electrons" (to explain the nuclear charge) and 7 "orbital electrons", as in a 1929 chemistry book which I recall once seeing in someone's attic! (sorry, no proper source) If van den Broek in 1911 explained N-14 with just 7 protons and 7 electrons (and no neutrons of course), then he was ignoring the mass problem.

If I am right than the above quote should be changed to just "the first who realized that the number of an element in the periodic table corresponds to the charge of the atom nucleus," without reference to protons or electrons. Dirac66 (talk) 01:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]