Talk:Antonin Raymond/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments:
- "After the war, Raymond's practice with Tuttle, Seelye and Place dissolved and he went into business with another Czech architect, Ladislav Leland Rado (1909-1993), Raymond & L. L. Rado" - The last two parts are a bit confusing. Did they set up two companies? It needs a bit more clarity.
I have helped copy edit the article, mainly for punctuation issues and MoS compliance. The only thing left is the clarification for the sentence above. I will place this On Hold in the meantime.
- Thanks for your time reviewing this article. I have amended the problem sentence and I hope this helps to clarify things! Kenchikuben (talk) 19:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification. I am now satisfied that the article meets all the criteria for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it. Well done! -- S Masters (talk) 04:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)