Jump to content

Talk:Anton Abele

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reverts of my edits

[edit]

Why are my edits being reverted wholesale? I've cleaned up the article from weasel and peacock words/wording, added new information, new reliable sources and replaced dead links. Is it my removal of the section headings that are throwing people off and causes them to assume I've somehow vandalized the page? I removed them because I thought they were superfluous for such a short article, but if there's a consensus to add section headings back, I will of course bend. ENCRYPTMATRON (talk) 08:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, some of your edits on the article are plain deletion of sourced material.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:17, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If there's anything you want added back, why don't you add that back rather than removing every single improvement I made (including replacing dead links), and we can discuss whether or not those specific paragraphs deserve a place in the article. What is it you think I shouldn't have removed, exactly? ENCRYPTMATRON (talk) 13:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've requested a third opinion. ENCRYPTMATRON (talk) 13:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Let me just add that this article was COI-tagged by User:Bender235, which is what spurred me to improve on it. After having seen my edits reverted by User:BabbaQ a couple of times, Bender235 once reverted my improvements. I asked him why on his talk page, and he said "Actually you might be correct, I'm sorry" ([1]) (just to pre-emptively clarify that this is a conflict between 2 users, no more). User:BabbaQ has accused me of removing sourced information (which of course wouldn't be a ground to revert all my improvements, but still). I didn't think this info was very relevant (and the source provided didn't give support for any of the statements I removed) but I tried to meet babbaQ halfway by finding a different reliable source and adding back a mention of it (these 2 edits: [2], [3]). This didn't help, apparently, as I find myself reverted again, and the page protected at the request of User:BabbaQ.ENCRYPTMATRON (talk) 13:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion

[edit]

I'm not sure what you expect from a third opinion but here it is anyway. I compared this ENCRYPTMATRON version against this current one. Both versions have problems but the ENCRYPTMATRON has more. The current version does appear promotional and needs to be edited. The problem with the ENCRYPTMATRON version is in the last paragraph. Since this is a BLP, negative information needs to be impeccably sourced but the sources here are not in English. --rgpk (comment) 13:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is an ongoing campaign to smear Mr Anton Abele. It is driven by his political opponents. Repeatedly comments are being posted here and should be removed. This type of political feud is not to be run here. It is important to note that none of the Swedish newspapers or TV stations have covered this story. In addition, the aim of this political campaign to slender Abele may have legal implications, as claims refers to a 1,5 minute long speech while the entire speech is more than 10 minutes. Furthermore, copies of a clip have illegally been posted on youtube.com and other sites, and have promptly been removed due to copyright/infringment. Jan 12, 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitecloudsandbluesky (talk • contribs) 10:19, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Anton Abele. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anton Abele. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anton_Abele&oldid=1249039081"