This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
According to my notes (for which I can't locate the source), Antoine had two additional kids: Charles, who was Bishop of Metz 1550-51, and Louis, who was a Cardinal 1553-78. Anybody know about these guys? --Michael K. Smith (talk) 03:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No duplink, dablink, copyvio issues. No external links
Sourcing looks decent, citations neatly formatted. But all bullets in Family don't have inline citations. I have removed those particular children, as I was not able to verify them.
Does 14/15 September 1515 mean the battle date is not confirmed or was it supposed to be an endash? Have changed to proper date with endash.
Why is the last para of Duchy legal status in present tense unlike the rest of the article? fixed
There should ideally be a different section on Death and possibly Legacy. Expanded. I was not sure how far down the "rabbit hole" to go. Thoughts?
Link terms such as 'gout' at first mention. fixed
All the changes look good. I changed Legacy to Aftermath in the section heading as it's more of the events that followed his death and not like what significant influence he has had in recent times. Should be okay to promote now, cheers Sainsf(talk·contribs)06:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]