Talk:Antitribu

Deletion

This is an excellent candidate for deletion.

-- Just curious why you feel that way? It fills a function in the V:tM pages by describing how the Antitribu differ from the parent clans. Checked this is a sock puppet.Cameronmurtagh 16:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that the antitribu article is relevant enough to merit an article. I am, however, curious about the last line:

"A vampire who drops out of undead politics altogether is called an autarkis."

I'm not sure if it is really relevant to the antitribu article. There is a tenuous connection in the fact that both antitribu and autarkis are not followers of the mainstream of their clan... However, autarkis is not an extreme case of antitribu, as the line makes it seem. An antitribu is not one who "drops out of undead politics," but rather one who disagrees with the majority of the politics of her clan.

This being the case, autarkis might be relevant enough for a "See also" but not close enough in concept to merit inclusion in the main body of the article. I will go ahead and make the change, but if there is disagreement, feel free to undo and we can discuss. Wdavis1911 22:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anarch

Article doesn't deal with anarchs. Assume, for the sake of argument, that a Ventrue joins the Anarchs. Is he antitribu? Certainly the vast majority of Ventrue are Camarilla. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.182.49 (talk) 07:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]