Talk:Antipater (1st-century BC physician)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1st century BC physician) to (1st-century BC physician)
[edit]Would there be any objection to moving this article to Antipater (1st-century BC physician)? Since 1st and century are working together as a compound adjective before the noun physician, it should be hyphenated. Antipater (1st century BC physician) would remain as a redirect to the new title. If there's a consensus, or at least no objection, I'll make the move in about a week. Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 05:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Second century or first century
[edit]Not sure if Antipater (1st-century BC physician) and Antipater (2nd-century physician) are distinct entities. Distinction sought with appropriate references. Diptanshu 💬 14:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Greek articles
- Low-importance Greek articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- Stub-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- Stub-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles