Jump to content

Talk:Antimonumenta (Guadalajara)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk15:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Antimonumenta
Antimonumenta
  • ... that antimonumentas in Mexico, like the one in Guadalajara (pictured), Morelia, or Mexico City, are installed by protesters to demand justice for women who suffer from violence in the country? Source: "Para las personas que no lo sepan, los antimonumentos son instalaciones que se colocan en marchas y protestas sociales como una forma de recordar la injusticia perpetrada contra un grupo de víctimas, así como el fracaso por parte del Estado para resolver de manera justa estos casos y evitar que sigan ocurriendo; se habla de antimonumentas para el caso de la violencia feminicida. Estas instalaciones son símbolos que surgen en clara oposición a la idea tradicional de monumento, que es erigido por autoridades para representar un discurso oficial."

["For those who do not know, antimonumentos are installations that are placed in demonstrations and social protests as a way to remember the injustice perpetrated against a group of victims, as well as the failure on the part of the State to resolve these cases in a just manner and prevent them from continuing to occur; we speak of antimonumentas in the case of feminicidal violence. These installations are symbols that emerge in clear opposition to the traditional idea of a monument, which is erected by authorities to represent an official discourse."] (Revista de la Universidad de México).

Created by Tbhotch (talk) and Another Believer (talk). Nominated by Tbhotch (talk) at 22:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment: Adding a review structure here, so multiple people can collaborate on this review (four articles is quite a few). If you choose to take an article, feel free to restructure the insides of that one however you wish. I tried implementing a table, but for some reason the subpage does not like that. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 10:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Anti-monuments in Mexico: Not assessed (replace everything after the colon with your signature when reviewing)
      • New enough:Unclear, but giving it a pass.
      • Long enough: Yes
      • Sourced: Yes
      • Neutral: Yes
      • Plagiarism-free:Earwig flagged some passages, but I believe it to be okay
      • Other issues:I think this is okay to go forward. --evrik (talk) 22:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Antimonumenta (Guadalajara): theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 10:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • New enough: Yes, expanded 35.3x on Jan. 23
      • Long enough: Yes, 3776 prose bytes
      • Sourced: AGF
      • Neutral: Yep!
      • Plagiarism-free: Accepted in good faith given translation
      • Other issues: Tbhotch seems to be responsible for 92.5% of the article's content, I'd say that the credit for Another Believer isn't strictly accurate given that this is for a 5x expansion
    • Antimonumenta (Morelia): TCMemoire 02:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • New enough: Yes, moved to mainspace on 23 January 2022
      • Long enough: Yes, ~2380 prose characters
      • Sourced: Yes, AGF
      • Neutral: Yes
      • Plagiarism-free: Yes
      • Other issues: Should be good to go, I added one inline citation to the lead.
    • Antimonumenta (Mexico City): Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • New enough: Moved to mainspace on January 23, 2022 (same day as the nomination)
      • Long enough: Yes (2668 characters)
      • Sourced: Technically yes, but not in the actual sentence discussing the women's protests; the reference has to be moved/duplicated there for DYK purposes. Yes
      • Neutral: Yes
      • Plagiarism-free: Yes
      • Other issues: Should be good to go one the footnote issue is addressed. Issues have been addressed.
    • Hook: Not assessed
      • Mentioned and cited in at least one article:
      • Interesting:
      • Other issues:
    • Image: Good to go :) theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 10:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • Used in at least one article: yep, infobox of Antimonumenta (Guadalajara)
      • Freely licensed: Claim of own work accepted in good faith
      • Clear at 100px: Yep!
    • QPQ: Checks out
    • Special date request: Yep, checks out
    • Overall: Review not finished